Prospective evaluation of intraarticular dextrose prolotherapy for treatment of osteoarthritis in dogs

Master of Science === Department of Clinical Sciences === James K. Roush === The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of intraarticular dextrose prolotherapy on osteoarthritis of the elbow or stifle in dogs. This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled prospective trial of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Sherwood, Jacob Matthew
Language:en_US
Published: Kansas State University 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/2097/17717
id ndltd-KSU-oai-krex.k-state.edu-2097-17717
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-KSU-oai-krex.k-state.edu-2097-177172016-03-01T03:51:58Z Prospective evaluation of intraarticular dextrose prolotherapy for treatment of osteoarthritis in dogs Sherwood, Jacob Matthew prolotherapy regenerative injection regenerative dextrose intraarticular osteoarthritis Veterinary Medicine (0778) Master of Science Department of Clinical Sciences James K. Roush The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of intraarticular dextrose prolotherapy on osteoarthritis of the elbow or stifle in dogs. This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled prospective trial of intraarticular dextrose prolotherapy given at 0 and 6 weeks for relief of osteoarthritis. Dogs with unilateral lameness were evaluated by orthopedic exam, visual lameness score, Canine Brief Pain Inventory (CBPI), goniometry, and by kinetic gait analysis at 0, 6 and 12 weeks. Joint radiographs were scored at 0 and 12 weeks. Ten client-owned dogs with naturally occurring osteoarthritis of the elbow or stifle were enrolled. Initial visual lameness, age, body weight, duration of lameness, and CBPI scores did not differ between groups. Change in CBPI PS score in the prolotherapy group from week 6-12 was significantly less improved than placebo with no other significant differences in CBPI Pain Severity (PS) or Pain Interference (PI) scores between groups. There were no significant differences for range of motion or radiographic scores between groups at any time. Kinetic forces improved in prolotherapy dogs, but were not significantly different between treatment groups at any time. There were no significant benefits of intraarticular dextrose prolotherapy for treatment of osteoarthritis of the elbow and stifle in dogs in this study. Larger enrollments and more stringent inclusion criteria should be considered in future evaluations of prolotherapy. 2014-05-09T11:46:29Z 2014-05-09T11:46:29Z 2014-05-09 2014 August Thesis http://hdl.handle.net/2097/17717 en_US Kansas State University
collection NDLTD
language en_US
sources NDLTD
topic prolotherapy
regenerative injection
regenerative
dextrose
intraarticular
osteoarthritis
Veterinary Medicine (0778)
spellingShingle prolotherapy
regenerative injection
regenerative
dextrose
intraarticular
osteoarthritis
Veterinary Medicine (0778)
Sherwood, Jacob Matthew
Prospective evaluation of intraarticular dextrose prolotherapy for treatment of osteoarthritis in dogs
description Master of Science === Department of Clinical Sciences === James K. Roush === The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of intraarticular dextrose prolotherapy on osteoarthritis of the elbow or stifle in dogs. This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled prospective trial of intraarticular dextrose prolotherapy given at 0 and 6 weeks for relief of osteoarthritis. Dogs with unilateral lameness were evaluated by orthopedic exam, visual lameness score, Canine Brief Pain Inventory (CBPI), goniometry, and by kinetic gait analysis at 0, 6 and 12 weeks. Joint radiographs were scored at 0 and 12 weeks. Ten client-owned dogs with naturally occurring osteoarthritis of the elbow or stifle were enrolled. Initial visual lameness, age, body weight, duration of lameness, and CBPI scores did not differ between groups. Change in CBPI PS score in the prolotherapy group from week 6-12 was significantly less improved than placebo with no other significant differences in CBPI Pain Severity (PS) or Pain Interference (PI) scores between groups. There were no significant differences for range of motion or radiographic scores between groups at any time. Kinetic forces improved in prolotherapy dogs, but were not significantly different between treatment groups at any time. There were no significant benefits of intraarticular dextrose prolotherapy for treatment of osteoarthritis of the elbow and stifle in dogs in this study. Larger enrollments and more stringent inclusion criteria should be considered in future evaluations of prolotherapy.
author Sherwood, Jacob Matthew
author_facet Sherwood, Jacob Matthew
author_sort Sherwood, Jacob Matthew
title Prospective evaluation of intraarticular dextrose prolotherapy for treatment of osteoarthritis in dogs
title_short Prospective evaluation of intraarticular dextrose prolotherapy for treatment of osteoarthritis in dogs
title_full Prospective evaluation of intraarticular dextrose prolotherapy for treatment of osteoarthritis in dogs
title_fullStr Prospective evaluation of intraarticular dextrose prolotherapy for treatment of osteoarthritis in dogs
title_full_unstemmed Prospective evaluation of intraarticular dextrose prolotherapy for treatment of osteoarthritis in dogs
title_sort prospective evaluation of intraarticular dextrose prolotherapy for treatment of osteoarthritis in dogs
publisher Kansas State University
publishDate 2014
url http://hdl.handle.net/2097/17717
work_keys_str_mv AT sherwoodjacobmatthew prospectiveevaluationofintraarticulardextroseprolotherapyfortreatmentofosteoarthritisindogs
_version_ 1718196875053498368