Educators' dilemmas : post high school transitions for students without documentation

Through an institutional ethnography in two secondary public schools in northwest Washington State, this research explores the web of social relations coordinating the lived experiences of students without legal immigration status and the educators who taught them. The U.S. Supreme Court decision,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Radoff, Sara A.
Language:English
Published: University of British Columbia 2011
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/2429/37301
id ndltd-LACETR-oai-collectionscanada.gc.ca-BVAU.-37301
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-LACETR-oai-collectionscanada.gc.ca-BVAU.-373012013-06-05T04:19:49ZEducators' dilemmas : post high school transitions for students without documentationRadoff, Sara A.Through an institutional ethnography in two secondary public schools in northwest Washington State, this research explores the web of social relations coordinating the lived experiences of students without legal immigration status and the educators who taught them. The U.S. Supreme Court decision, Plyler v. Doe, guarantees students’ access to a public K-12 education, regardless of immigration status. However, without a pathway to legalize their residency, unauthorized status inevitably denies these students full social membership in a polity, which excludes them from assuming paid professional careers, presents significant obstacles in pursuing higher education, and precludes their full social and political participation. Those without authorized status are unable to fully actualize the dreams, knowledge and skills developed throughout their education. Situated in this tension, I examined educators’ everyday schooling activities that prepared students for life after graduation. Educators’ daily practices groomed students to become college-bound and career-driven. To pursue these goals, my research suggests that ruling relations positioned educators to enact depoliticized discourses of meritocracy and a decontextaulized student-centered practice, as well as practices that silenced the social, political and economic contexts of students’ lives. Situated in a contradictory intersection of education and immigration policy, I argue that redressing the root cause of the injustice that students without legal status experience requires political action. This research suggests that educators dedicated to a socially just education grounded in human rights would commit to political action, express passionate and informed encouragement to their students, and acknowledge and engage status as a lived experience in their students’ lives.University of British Columbia2011-09-14T16:47:51Z2011-09-14T16:47:51Z20112011-09-142011-11Electronic Thesis or Dissertationhttp://hdl.handle.net/2429/37301eng
collection NDLTD
language English
sources NDLTD
description Through an institutional ethnography in two secondary public schools in northwest Washington State, this research explores the web of social relations coordinating the lived experiences of students without legal immigration status and the educators who taught them. The U.S. Supreme Court decision, Plyler v. Doe, guarantees students’ access to a public K-12 education, regardless of immigration status. However, without a pathway to legalize their residency, unauthorized status inevitably denies these students full social membership in a polity, which excludes them from assuming paid professional careers, presents significant obstacles in pursuing higher education, and precludes their full social and political participation. Those without authorized status are unable to fully actualize the dreams, knowledge and skills developed throughout their education. Situated in this tension, I examined educators’ everyday schooling activities that prepared students for life after graduation. Educators’ daily practices groomed students to become college-bound and career-driven. To pursue these goals, my research suggests that ruling relations positioned educators to enact depoliticized discourses of meritocracy and a decontextaulized student-centered practice, as well as practices that silenced the social, political and economic contexts of students’ lives. Situated in a contradictory intersection of education and immigration policy, I argue that redressing the root cause of the injustice that students without legal status experience requires political action. This research suggests that educators dedicated to a socially just education grounded in human rights would commit to political action, express passionate and informed encouragement to their students, and acknowledge and engage status as a lived experience in their students’ lives.
author Radoff, Sara A.
spellingShingle Radoff, Sara A.
Educators' dilemmas : post high school transitions for students without documentation
author_facet Radoff, Sara A.
author_sort Radoff, Sara A.
title Educators' dilemmas : post high school transitions for students without documentation
title_short Educators' dilemmas : post high school transitions for students without documentation
title_full Educators' dilemmas : post high school transitions for students without documentation
title_fullStr Educators' dilemmas : post high school transitions for students without documentation
title_full_unstemmed Educators' dilemmas : post high school transitions for students without documentation
title_sort educators' dilemmas : post high school transitions for students without documentation
publisher University of British Columbia
publishDate 2011
url http://hdl.handle.net/2429/37301
work_keys_str_mv AT radoffsaraa educatorsdilemmasposthighschooltransitionsforstudentswithoutdocumentation
_version_ 1716587943545536512