Risk ranking methodology for abandoned mine sites in B.C.

The Crown Contaminated Sites Branch (CCSB) of the Ministry of Agriculture and Lands (MAL) manages contaminated sites on Crown land where responsibility has defaulted to the Province. CCSB uses a multi-step prioritization process to identify and screen candidate contaminated sites, one of which is th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Power, B., Fikart, Alena, Tinholt, M., Wilson, R. M., Stewart, Gregg G. (Gregg Gordon), 1961-, Sinnett, G.
Language:English
Published: 2009
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/2429/8454
id ndltd-LACETR-oai-collectionscanada.gc.ca-BVAU.2429-8454
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-LACETR-oai-collectionscanada.gc.ca-BVAU.2429-84542014-03-14T15:42:34Z Risk ranking methodology for abandoned mine sites in B.C. Power, B. Fikart, Alena Tinholt, M. Wilson, R. M. Stewart, Gregg G. (Gregg Gordon), 1961- Sinnett, G. The Crown Contaminated Sites Branch (CCSB) of the Ministry of Agriculture and Lands (MAL) manages contaminated sites on Crown land where responsibility has defaulted to the Province. CCSB uses a multi-step prioritization process to identify and screen candidate contaminated sites, one of which is the Risk Ranking Methodology (RRM). Initially developed for MAL’s mines portfolio, the goal of the RRM is to provide a scientifically based method for evaluation and ranking of candidate Crown contaminated sites for potential risks to human health and the environment. MAL’s RRM has two components: (1) a risk ranking support tool (spreadsheet and documentation, known as the “Tool”) and (2) a workshop process. The Tool considers human health and ecological aspects separately. It calculates “weighted” chemical concentrations for various media, and then a screening quotient is determined using specified screening values. In addition, a series of important “flags” specific to the values being protected (e.g., humans, fish, listed species) are used to characterize the site. The RRM generates a comparative summary of the various lines of evidence for each site which is then used to support an expert process workshop to direct management decisions for undertaking additional site investigations and remediation. 2009-05-29T16:40:59Z 2009-05-29T16:40:59Z 2007 text http://hdl.handle.net/2429/8454 eng British Columbia Mine Reclamation Symposium 2007 British Columbia Technical and Research Committee on Reclamation
collection NDLTD
language English
sources NDLTD
description The Crown Contaminated Sites Branch (CCSB) of the Ministry of Agriculture and Lands (MAL) manages contaminated sites on Crown land where responsibility has defaulted to the Province. CCSB uses a multi-step prioritization process to identify and screen candidate contaminated sites, one of which is the Risk Ranking Methodology (RRM). Initially developed for MAL’s mines portfolio, the goal of the RRM is to provide a scientifically based method for evaluation and ranking of candidate Crown contaminated sites for potential risks to human health and the environment. MAL’s RRM has two components: (1) a risk ranking support tool (spreadsheet and documentation, known as the “Tool”) and (2) a workshop process. The Tool considers human health and ecological aspects separately. It calculates “weighted” chemical concentrations for various media, and then a screening quotient is determined using specified screening values. In addition, a series of important “flags” specific to the values being protected (e.g., humans, fish, listed species) are used to characterize the site. The RRM generates a comparative summary of the various lines of evidence for each site which is then used to support an expert process workshop to direct management decisions for undertaking additional site investigations and remediation.
author Power, B.
Fikart, Alena
Tinholt, M.
Wilson, R. M.
Stewart, Gregg G. (Gregg Gordon), 1961-
Sinnett, G.
spellingShingle Power, B.
Fikart, Alena
Tinholt, M.
Wilson, R. M.
Stewart, Gregg G. (Gregg Gordon), 1961-
Sinnett, G.
Risk ranking methodology for abandoned mine sites in B.C.
author_facet Power, B.
Fikart, Alena
Tinholt, M.
Wilson, R. M.
Stewart, Gregg G. (Gregg Gordon), 1961-
Sinnett, G.
author_sort Power, B.
title Risk ranking methodology for abandoned mine sites in B.C.
title_short Risk ranking methodology for abandoned mine sites in B.C.
title_full Risk ranking methodology for abandoned mine sites in B.C.
title_fullStr Risk ranking methodology for abandoned mine sites in B.C.
title_full_unstemmed Risk ranking methodology for abandoned mine sites in B.C.
title_sort risk ranking methodology for abandoned mine sites in b.c.
publishDate 2009
url http://hdl.handle.net/2429/8454
work_keys_str_mv AT powerb riskrankingmethodologyforabandonedminesitesinbc
AT fikartalena riskrankingmethodologyforabandonedminesitesinbc
AT tinholtm riskrankingmethodologyforabandonedminesitesinbc
AT wilsonrm riskrankingmethodologyforabandonedminesitesinbc
AT stewartgreggggregggordon1961 riskrankingmethodologyforabandonedminesitesinbc
AT sinnettg riskrankingmethodologyforabandonedminesitesinbc
_version_ 1716651413193359360