Getting Behind the Grain: The Politics of Producer Opposition to GM Wheat on the Canadian Prairies

On May tenth, 2004 Monsanto announced that it would discontinue breeding and field level research of transgenic Roundup Ready (RR) wheat. This decision was heavily influenced by the widespread rejection of RR wheat by Canadian prairie producers who voiced their opposition through a diverse coalitio...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Eaton, Emily Marie
Other Authors: Prudham, W. Scott
Language:en_ca
Published: 2009
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1807/19265
id ndltd-LACETR-oai-collectionscanada.gc.ca-OTU.1807-19265
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-LACETR-oai-collectionscanada.gc.ca-OTU.1807-192652013-04-17T04:18:16ZGetting Behind the Grain: The Politics of Producer Opposition to GM Wheat on the Canadian PrairiesEaton, Emily Marieagriculturepolitical economy and ecology0366On May tenth, 2004 Monsanto announced that it would discontinue breeding and field level research of transgenic Roundup Ready (RR) wheat. This decision was heavily influenced by the widespread rejection of RR wheat by Canadian prairie producers who voiced their opposition through a diverse coalition of rural and urban organizations. With six of the nine member organizations representing rural and farm groups, this research departs from the most common representation of anti-GM movements as being urban and European-centred. This dissertation contrasts the general acceptance of Monsanto’s Roundup Ready canola just five years earlier (in the mid 90s) with the widespread opposition amongst prairie producers to RR wheat. It uses an updated version of the agrarian question and the production of nature thesis to show how capitalist relations are differentiated across place and commodities. The research finds that producer resistance to RR wheat hinged on the specificities of local histories and institutions, cultural conceptions of worth and economic fair treatment, and the character of wheat as a commodity with particular biophysical properties. The research is also concerned with the ways in which producers articulated their resistance with and through discourses of consumption, while at the same time rejecting the attempts made by proponents of RR wheat to relegate them to consuming subjects, who would best register their dissent by voting with their dollars on the market. For many prairie farm organizations, the fate of the family farm is tied up with the future of wheat farming and the capacity of farmers to collectively market their wheat in international markets. Monsanto’s vision for the future of prairie wheat crossed moral and cultural boundaries for producers and organizations that understood themselves as active subjects.Prudham, W. Scott2009-112010-03-03T17:26:38ZNO_RESTRICTION2010-03-03T17:26:38Z2010-03-03T17:26:38ZThesishttp://hdl.handle.net/1807/19265en_ca
collection NDLTD
language en_ca
sources NDLTD
topic agriculture
political economy and ecology
0366
spellingShingle agriculture
political economy and ecology
0366
Eaton, Emily Marie
Getting Behind the Grain: The Politics of Producer Opposition to GM Wheat on the Canadian Prairies
description On May tenth, 2004 Monsanto announced that it would discontinue breeding and field level research of transgenic Roundup Ready (RR) wheat. This decision was heavily influenced by the widespread rejection of RR wheat by Canadian prairie producers who voiced their opposition through a diverse coalition of rural and urban organizations. With six of the nine member organizations representing rural and farm groups, this research departs from the most common representation of anti-GM movements as being urban and European-centred. This dissertation contrasts the general acceptance of Monsanto’s Roundup Ready canola just five years earlier (in the mid 90s) with the widespread opposition amongst prairie producers to RR wheat. It uses an updated version of the agrarian question and the production of nature thesis to show how capitalist relations are differentiated across place and commodities. The research finds that producer resistance to RR wheat hinged on the specificities of local histories and institutions, cultural conceptions of worth and economic fair treatment, and the character of wheat as a commodity with particular biophysical properties. The research is also concerned with the ways in which producers articulated their resistance with and through discourses of consumption, while at the same time rejecting the attempts made by proponents of RR wheat to relegate them to consuming subjects, who would best register their dissent by voting with their dollars on the market. For many prairie farm organizations, the fate of the family farm is tied up with the future of wheat farming and the capacity of farmers to collectively market their wheat in international markets. Monsanto’s vision for the future of prairie wheat crossed moral and cultural boundaries for producers and organizations that understood themselves as active subjects.
author2 Prudham, W. Scott
author_facet Prudham, W. Scott
Eaton, Emily Marie
author Eaton, Emily Marie
author_sort Eaton, Emily Marie
title Getting Behind the Grain: The Politics of Producer Opposition to GM Wheat on the Canadian Prairies
title_short Getting Behind the Grain: The Politics of Producer Opposition to GM Wheat on the Canadian Prairies
title_full Getting Behind the Grain: The Politics of Producer Opposition to GM Wheat on the Canadian Prairies
title_fullStr Getting Behind the Grain: The Politics of Producer Opposition to GM Wheat on the Canadian Prairies
title_full_unstemmed Getting Behind the Grain: The Politics of Producer Opposition to GM Wheat on the Canadian Prairies
title_sort getting behind the grain: the politics of producer opposition to gm wheat on the canadian prairies
publishDate 2009
url http://hdl.handle.net/1807/19265
work_keys_str_mv AT eatonemilymarie gettingbehindthegrainthepoliticsofproduceroppositiontogmwheatonthecanadianprairies
_version_ 1716580341019312128