Crack Growth Rate and Crack Path in Adhesively Bonded Joints: Comparison of Creep, Fatigue and Fracture

The relationship between crack path and test method was examined by comparing the performance of adhesive-adherend combinations (six) in quasi-static fracture, mixed-mode fatigue, and creep crack growth. Crack paths in creep and quasi-static fracture were similar due to similar crack-tip plastic zon...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Jhin, Minseok
Other Authors: Spelt, Jan K.
Language:en_ca
Published: 2012
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1807/33256
id ndltd-LACETR-oai-collectionscanada.gc.ca-OTU.1807-33256
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-LACETR-oai-collectionscanada.gc.ca-OTU.1807-332562013-11-02T03:43:50ZCrack Growth Rate and Crack Path in Adhesively Bonded Joints: Comparison of Creep, Fatigue and FractureJhin, MinseokAdhesive JointsFracture MechanicsCrack PathPlastic ZoneCreep Crack GrowthFatigueQuasi-Static FractureTest MethodCrack Growth Rate0548The relationship between crack path and test method was examined by comparing the performance of adhesive-adherend combinations (six) in quasi-static fracture, mixed-mode fatigue, and creep crack growth. Crack paths in creep and quasi-static fracture were similar due to similar crack-tip plastic zone sizes in the epoxy adhesive even though the crack growth rates in creep were much smaller. Under condensed moisture and mixed-mode, creep and threshold fatigue tests produced interfacial failure. Under room-temperature dry environment, near threshold mixed-mode fatigue was interfacial, but was not in creep or quasi-static fracture. Smaller plastic zone size and crack path proximity to the interface that followed increased the sensitivity of near threshold, mixed-mode fatigue to surface properties. Therefore, the interfacial or cohesive failure of an adhesive system, which may judge the quality of the bond, can be a function of the test being conducted and may not be an absolute indicator of joint quality.Spelt, Jan K.Papini, Marcello2012-112012-11-20T18:08:26ZNO_RESTRICTION2012-11-20T18:08:26Z2012-11-20Thesishttp://hdl.handle.net/1807/33256en_ca
collection NDLTD
language en_ca
sources NDLTD
topic Adhesive Joints
Fracture Mechanics
Crack Path
Plastic Zone
Creep Crack Growth
Fatigue
Quasi-Static Fracture
Test Method
Crack Growth Rate
0548
spellingShingle Adhesive Joints
Fracture Mechanics
Crack Path
Plastic Zone
Creep Crack Growth
Fatigue
Quasi-Static Fracture
Test Method
Crack Growth Rate
0548
Jhin, Minseok
Crack Growth Rate and Crack Path in Adhesively Bonded Joints: Comparison of Creep, Fatigue and Fracture
description The relationship between crack path and test method was examined by comparing the performance of adhesive-adherend combinations (six) in quasi-static fracture, mixed-mode fatigue, and creep crack growth. Crack paths in creep and quasi-static fracture were similar due to similar crack-tip plastic zone sizes in the epoxy adhesive even though the crack growth rates in creep were much smaller. Under condensed moisture and mixed-mode, creep and threshold fatigue tests produced interfacial failure. Under room-temperature dry environment, near threshold mixed-mode fatigue was interfacial, but was not in creep or quasi-static fracture. Smaller plastic zone size and crack path proximity to the interface that followed increased the sensitivity of near threshold, mixed-mode fatigue to surface properties. Therefore, the interfacial or cohesive failure of an adhesive system, which may judge the quality of the bond, can be a function of the test being conducted and may not be an absolute indicator of joint quality.
author2 Spelt, Jan K.
author_facet Spelt, Jan K.
Jhin, Minseok
author Jhin, Minseok
author_sort Jhin, Minseok
title Crack Growth Rate and Crack Path in Adhesively Bonded Joints: Comparison of Creep, Fatigue and Fracture
title_short Crack Growth Rate and Crack Path in Adhesively Bonded Joints: Comparison of Creep, Fatigue and Fracture
title_full Crack Growth Rate and Crack Path in Adhesively Bonded Joints: Comparison of Creep, Fatigue and Fracture
title_fullStr Crack Growth Rate and Crack Path in Adhesively Bonded Joints: Comparison of Creep, Fatigue and Fracture
title_full_unstemmed Crack Growth Rate and Crack Path in Adhesively Bonded Joints: Comparison of Creep, Fatigue and Fracture
title_sort crack growth rate and crack path in adhesively bonded joints: comparison of creep, fatigue and fracture
publishDate 2012
url http://hdl.handle.net/1807/33256
work_keys_str_mv AT jhinminseok crackgrowthrateandcrackpathinadhesivelybondedjointscomparisonofcreepfatigueandfracture
_version_ 1716612900612734976