Disambiguating Rebirth: A Socio-rhetorical Exploration of Rebirth Language in 1 Peter
Rebirth language has traditionally been associated with the initiation rite of baptism and relegated to discussions within this limited framework. Analyses of 1 Peter—where rebirth language is particularly dominant—have focussed almost exclusively on a baptismal framework for understanding this lan...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Language: | en_ca |
Published: |
2012
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/1807/42495 |
id |
ndltd-LACETR-oai-collectionscanada.gc.ca-OTU.1807-42495 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-LACETR-oai-collectionscanada.gc.ca-OTU.1807-424952013-12-03T03:38:51ZDisambiguating Rebirth: A Socio-rhetorical Exploration of Rebirth Language in 1 PeterHammer, Keir1 Peterrebirthsocio-rhetorical0321Rebirth language has traditionally been associated with the initiation rite of baptism and relegated to discussions within this limited framework. Analyses of 1 Peter—where rebirth language is particularly dominant—have focussed almost exclusively on a baptismal framework for understanding this language. However, a detailed reading of the letter does not reveal any association between rebirth and Christian rites of initiation. Whatever action, activity or idea triggered the use of this language, its role in the letter has never been adequately explored. This study employs socio-rhetorical analysis to examine the role of rebirth language within the letter of 1 Peter and within its larger cultural and textual context. Rebirth language is employed in the key opening section of the letter and, within the framework of familial language, serves as a central distinctive of the letter’s recipient-focussed argument. As part of the familial metaphor, rebirth highlights the readers’ identity as children whose πατήρ (“father”) is God. A comprehensive analysis of all other extant (first century) texts employing rebirth language, reveals that, while 1 Peter’s use of such language shares some points of contact with other expressions of rebirth, the meaning of rebirth in 1 Peter is not directly tied to any related language. More likely, 1 Peter contains cultural allusions to the developing idea of rebirth that is also shared—in different ways—with other extant materials. No other source, however, contains the same usage and implied meaning of rebirth language as 1 Peter. Instead, 1 Peter’s author, building upon the powerful father-child analogy, intends to shape his readers’ self-perceptions using this language to provide a sense of identity without encouraging extensive alienation from the larger society. 1 Peter’s use of rebirth language builds upon and intensifies the cultural familial metaphor in order to help firmly establish the recipients’ Christian identity in the midst of their associations and interactions within their social context.Richardson, Peter2012-032013-11-19T17:29:17ZWITHHELD_ONE_YEAR2013-11-19T17:29:17Z2013-11-19Thesishttp://hdl.handle.net/1807/42495en_ca |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
en_ca |
sources |
NDLTD |
topic |
1 Peter rebirth socio-rhetorical 0321 |
spellingShingle |
1 Peter rebirth socio-rhetorical 0321 Hammer, Keir Disambiguating Rebirth: A Socio-rhetorical Exploration of Rebirth Language in 1 Peter |
description |
Rebirth language has traditionally been associated with the initiation rite of baptism and relegated to discussions within this limited framework. Analyses of 1 Peter—where rebirth language is particularly dominant—have focussed almost exclusively on a baptismal framework for understanding this language. However, a detailed reading of the letter does not reveal any association between rebirth and Christian rites of initiation. Whatever action, activity or idea triggered the use of this language, its role in the letter has never been adequately explored.
This study employs socio-rhetorical analysis to examine the role of rebirth language within the letter of 1 Peter and within its larger cultural and textual context. Rebirth language is employed in the key opening section of the letter and, within the framework of familial language, serves as a central distinctive of the letter’s recipient-focussed argument. As part of the familial metaphor, rebirth highlights the readers’ identity as children whose πατήρ (“father”) is God. A comprehensive analysis of all other extant (first century) texts employing rebirth language, reveals that, while 1 Peter’s use of such language shares some points of contact with other expressions of rebirth, the meaning of rebirth in 1 Peter is not directly tied to any related language. More likely, 1 Peter contains cultural allusions to the developing idea of rebirth that is also shared—in different ways—with other extant materials. No other source, however, contains the same usage and implied meaning of rebirth language as 1 Peter. Instead, 1 Peter’s author, building upon the powerful father-child analogy, intends to shape his readers’ self-perceptions using this language to provide a sense of identity without encouraging extensive alienation from the larger society. 1 Peter’s use of rebirth language builds upon and intensifies the cultural familial metaphor in order to help firmly establish the recipients’ Christian identity in the midst of their associations and interactions within their social context. |
author2 |
Richardson, Peter |
author_facet |
Richardson, Peter Hammer, Keir |
author |
Hammer, Keir |
author_sort |
Hammer, Keir |
title |
Disambiguating Rebirth: A Socio-rhetorical Exploration of Rebirth Language in 1 Peter |
title_short |
Disambiguating Rebirth: A Socio-rhetorical Exploration of Rebirth Language in 1 Peter |
title_full |
Disambiguating Rebirth: A Socio-rhetorical Exploration of Rebirth Language in 1 Peter |
title_fullStr |
Disambiguating Rebirth: A Socio-rhetorical Exploration of Rebirth Language in 1 Peter |
title_full_unstemmed |
Disambiguating Rebirth: A Socio-rhetorical Exploration of Rebirth Language in 1 Peter |
title_sort |
disambiguating rebirth: a socio-rhetorical exploration of rebirth language in 1 peter |
publishDate |
2012 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/1807/42495 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT hammerkeir disambiguatingrebirthasociorhetoricalexplorationofrebirthlanguagein1peter |
_version_ |
1716616036725293056 |