The Episodic Nature of "Blessedness" in Spinoza's Ethics

The final chapter of Spinoza’s Ethics has elicited numerous interpretations, and in this work, I discuss Jonathan Bennett’s and Harry Wolfson’s. Bennett claims that the doctrine of blessedness is unintelligible, while Wolfson claims that Spinoza’s account of blessedness actually defends traditional...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Griem, Dennis
Language:en
Published: 2008
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10012/4051
id ndltd-LACETR-oai-collectionscanada.gc.ca-OWTU.10012-4051
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-LACETR-oai-collectionscanada.gc.ca-OWTU.10012-40512013-10-04T04:08:40ZGriem, Dennis2008-09-26T14:53:01Z2008-09-26T14:53:01Z2008-09-26T14:53:01Z2008-09-23http://hdl.handle.net/10012/4051The final chapter of Spinoza’s Ethics has elicited numerous interpretations, and in this work, I discuss Jonathan Bennett’s and Harry Wolfson’s. Bennett claims that the doctrine of blessedness is unintelligible, while Wolfson claims that Spinoza’s account of blessedness actually defends traditional, medieval views of the immortality of the soul. I find neither of these acceptable accounts for the reasons presented below, and I have a simple alternative explanation for this doctrine. Essentially, I argue that by ‘blessedness’ Spinoza means being happy with being virtuous. In my reading of the Ethics, Spinoza first offers the account that we should help others in order to help ourselves, and then he explains that we should enjoy doing so, and he writes that being happy with this is called ‘blessedness.’enSpinoza's EthicsSpinoza's Ethics Part 5Jonathan BennettEdwin CurleyThe third kind of knowledgeThe intellectual love of GodThe eternity of the mindVirtue and Power in SpinozaThe Episodic Nature of "Blessedness" in Spinoza's EthicsThesis or DissertationPhilosophyMaster of ArtsPhilosophy
collection NDLTD
language en
sources NDLTD
topic Spinoza's Ethics
Spinoza's Ethics Part 5
Jonathan Bennett
Edwin Curley
The third kind of knowledge
The intellectual love of God
The eternity of the mind
Virtue and Power in Spinoza
Philosophy
spellingShingle Spinoza's Ethics
Spinoza's Ethics Part 5
Jonathan Bennett
Edwin Curley
The third kind of knowledge
The intellectual love of God
The eternity of the mind
Virtue and Power in Spinoza
Philosophy
Griem, Dennis
The Episodic Nature of "Blessedness" in Spinoza's Ethics
description The final chapter of Spinoza’s Ethics has elicited numerous interpretations, and in this work, I discuss Jonathan Bennett’s and Harry Wolfson’s. Bennett claims that the doctrine of blessedness is unintelligible, while Wolfson claims that Spinoza’s account of blessedness actually defends traditional, medieval views of the immortality of the soul. I find neither of these acceptable accounts for the reasons presented below, and I have a simple alternative explanation for this doctrine. Essentially, I argue that by ‘blessedness’ Spinoza means being happy with being virtuous. In my reading of the Ethics, Spinoza first offers the account that we should help others in order to help ourselves, and then he explains that we should enjoy doing so, and he writes that being happy with this is called ‘blessedness.’
author Griem, Dennis
author_facet Griem, Dennis
author_sort Griem, Dennis
title The Episodic Nature of "Blessedness" in Spinoza's Ethics
title_short The Episodic Nature of "Blessedness" in Spinoza's Ethics
title_full The Episodic Nature of "Blessedness" in Spinoza's Ethics
title_fullStr The Episodic Nature of "Blessedness" in Spinoza's Ethics
title_full_unstemmed The Episodic Nature of "Blessedness" in Spinoza's Ethics
title_sort episodic nature of "blessedness" in spinoza's ethics
publishDate 2008
url http://hdl.handle.net/10012/4051
work_keys_str_mv AT griemdennis theepisodicnatureofblessednessinspinozasethics
AT griemdennis episodicnatureofblessednessinspinozasethics
_version_ 1716600081448173568