The design and evaluation of soil conservation systems in St. Lucia /

Three soil conservation systems: contour drainage, strip cropping, and terracing, were designed and established within separate plots on hillside farmlands in St. Lucia. A control plot with no form of soil conservation was also established. Topographic and soils surveys of these plots were conducted...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Norville, Peter
Format: Others
Language:en
Published: McGill University 1989
Subjects:
Online Access:http://digitool.Library.McGill.CA:80/R/?func=dbin-jump-full&object_id=59576
id ndltd-LACETR-oai-collectionscanada.gc.ca-QMM.59576
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-LACETR-oai-collectionscanada.gc.ca-QMM.595762014-02-13T04:01:19ZThe design and evaluation of soil conservation systems in St. Lucia /Norville, PeterSoil conservation -- Saint Lucia.Three soil conservation systems: contour drainage, strip cropping, and terracing, were designed and established within separate plots on hillside farmlands in St. Lucia. A control plot with no form of soil conservation was also established. Topographic and soils surveys of these plots were conducted. Rainfall, runoff and soil loss were measured over one wet season. Crop yields and construction and maintenance costs were also determined.For rainfall amounts between 14.2 and 211.2 mm, runoff depths varied from 0.6 to 203.6 mm in the control plot, 2.1 to 199.2 mm in the contour drained plot, 3.2 to 155.1 mm in the strip cropped plot and 1.3 to 94.7 mm in the terraced plot. The largest amounts of runoff were most often recorded in the strip cropped plot, while on most occasions, the terraced plot produced the least runoff.Soil loss rates varied from 0.01 to 1.77 kg/ha in the control plot, 0.07 to 16.88 kg/ha in the contour drained plot, 0.2 to 28.86 kg/ha in the strip cropped plot and 0.01 to 6.62 kg/ha in the terraced plot.Construction costs per hectare were EC$5565 for the contour drainage system, EC $5425 for the strip cropped system and EC$6350 for the terraced system.Further monitoring of the conservation systems is required for prediction of their long-term effectiveness in runoff and soil erosion control.McGill University1989Electronic Thesis or Dissertationapplication/pdfenalephsysno: 001069671proquestno: AAIMM63732Theses scanned by UMI/ProQuest.All items in eScholarship@McGill are protected by copyright with all rights reserved unless otherwise indicated.Master of Science (Department of Agricultural Engineering.) http://digitool.Library.McGill.CA:80/R/?func=dbin-jump-full&object_id=59576
collection NDLTD
language en
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Soil conservation -- Saint Lucia.
spellingShingle Soil conservation -- Saint Lucia.
Norville, Peter
The design and evaluation of soil conservation systems in St. Lucia /
description Three soil conservation systems: contour drainage, strip cropping, and terracing, were designed and established within separate plots on hillside farmlands in St. Lucia. A control plot with no form of soil conservation was also established. Topographic and soils surveys of these plots were conducted. Rainfall, runoff and soil loss were measured over one wet season. Crop yields and construction and maintenance costs were also determined. === For rainfall amounts between 14.2 and 211.2 mm, runoff depths varied from 0.6 to 203.6 mm in the control plot, 2.1 to 199.2 mm in the contour drained plot, 3.2 to 155.1 mm in the strip cropped plot and 1.3 to 94.7 mm in the terraced plot. The largest amounts of runoff were most often recorded in the strip cropped plot, while on most occasions, the terraced plot produced the least runoff. === Soil loss rates varied from 0.01 to 1.77 kg/ha in the control plot, 0.07 to 16.88 kg/ha in the contour drained plot, 0.2 to 28.86 kg/ha in the strip cropped plot and 0.01 to 6.62 kg/ha in the terraced plot. === Construction costs per hectare were EC$5565 for the contour drainage system, EC $5425 for the strip cropped system and EC$6350 for the terraced system. === Further monitoring of the conservation systems is required for prediction of their long-term effectiveness in runoff and soil erosion control.
author Norville, Peter
author_facet Norville, Peter
author_sort Norville, Peter
title The design and evaluation of soil conservation systems in St. Lucia /
title_short The design and evaluation of soil conservation systems in St. Lucia /
title_full The design and evaluation of soil conservation systems in St. Lucia /
title_fullStr The design and evaluation of soil conservation systems in St. Lucia /
title_full_unstemmed The design and evaluation of soil conservation systems in St. Lucia /
title_sort design and evaluation of soil conservation systems in st. lucia /
publisher McGill University
publishDate 1989
url http://digitool.Library.McGill.CA:80/R/?func=dbin-jump-full&object_id=59576
work_keys_str_mv AT norvillepeter thedesignandevaluationofsoilconservationsystemsinstlucia
AT norvillepeter designandevaluationofsoilconservationsystemsinstlucia
_version_ 1716643506326339584