Gay-Marriage in 2004 U.S. Presidential Election

This thesis looks at the factors that affected individual turnout and vote choice in the 2004 U.S. presidential election. Regarding the outcome of the election, a point of dispute among scholars pertains to whether evangelical Christians played a meaningful role in helping re-elect then-President B...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Dunphy, James
Other Authors: Hogan, Robert
Format: Others
Language:en
Published: LSU 2011
Subjects:
Online Access:http://etd.lsu.edu/docs/available/etd-04272011-155810/
id ndltd-LSU-oai-etd.lsu.edu-etd-04272011-155810
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-LSU-oai-etd.lsu.edu-etd-04272011-1558102013-01-07T22:53:19Z Gay-Marriage in 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Dunphy, James Political Science This thesis looks at the factors that affected individual turnout and vote choice in the 2004 U.S. presidential election. Regarding the outcome of the election, a point of dispute among scholars pertains to whether evangelical Christians played a meaningful role in helping re-elect then-President Bush to a second term in 2004. The gay-marriage issue played a prominent role in the presidential campaign, due in part to a ruling the Massachusetts Supreme Court rendered in November 2003 that legalized the marrying of same-sex couples within the states borders. The Courts decision had a reverberating effect, particularly among evangelicals, and subsequently, it affected the presidential campaign as well. Christian conservatives were successful in organizing efforts to get initiatives and referenda designed to constitutionally ban recognition of same-sex marriages on the ballot in 11 states, all of which passed easily in November. Using a large and previously untapped dataset, I develop a research design that builds on work by Campbell and Monson (2008), which shows that evangelicals who lived in a state with a marriage amendment on the ballot in November had a higher level of mobilization for Bush than other evangelicals. Contrary to those findings, I find that the marriage amendments in 2004 had no substantive impact on turnout or vote choice. Moreover, evangelicals living in marriage states were not more likely to turn out or vote for Bush in 2004, controlling for other relevant characteristics of the voters. Factors that influenced turnout in the 2004 election include: party identification strength, education, income, age, gender, region, and residence in a battleground state. Party identification, ideology, and race were predictors of vote choice in the 2004 election. Hogan, Robert Garand, James Clark, William LSU 2011-04-28 text application/pdf http://etd.lsu.edu/docs/available/etd-04272011-155810/ http://etd.lsu.edu/docs/available/etd-04272011-155810/ en unrestricted I hereby certify that, if appropriate, I have obtained and attached herein a written permission statement from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis, dissertation, or project report, allowing distribution as specified below. I certify that the version I submitted is the same as that approved by my advisory committee. I hereby grant to LSU or its agents the non-exclusive license to archive and make accessible, under the conditions specified below and in appropriate University policies, my thesis, dissertation, or project report in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. I retain all other ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis, dissertation or project report. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis, dissertation, or project report.
collection NDLTD
language en
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Political Science
spellingShingle Political Science
Dunphy, James
Gay-Marriage in 2004 U.S. Presidential Election
description This thesis looks at the factors that affected individual turnout and vote choice in the 2004 U.S. presidential election. Regarding the outcome of the election, a point of dispute among scholars pertains to whether evangelical Christians played a meaningful role in helping re-elect then-President Bush to a second term in 2004. The gay-marriage issue played a prominent role in the presidential campaign, due in part to a ruling the Massachusetts Supreme Court rendered in November 2003 that legalized the marrying of same-sex couples within the states borders. The Courts decision had a reverberating effect, particularly among evangelicals, and subsequently, it affected the presidential campaign as well. Christian conservatives were successful in organizing efforts to get initiatives and referenda designed to constitutionally ban recognition of same-sex marriages on the ballot in 11 states, all of which passed easily in November. Using a large and previously untapped dataset, I develop a research design that builds on work by Campbell and Monson (2008), which shows that evangelicals who lived in a state with a marriage amendment on the ballot in November had a higher level of mobilization for Bush than other evangelicals. Contrary to those findings, I find that the marriage amendments in 2004 had no substantive impact on turnout or vote choice. Moreover, evangelicals living in marriage states were not more likely to turn out or vote for Bush in 2004, controlling for other relevant characteristics of the voters. Factors that influenced turnout in the 2004 election include: party identification strength, education, income, age, gender, region, and residence in a battleground state. Party identification, ideology, and race were predictors of vote choice in the 2004 election.
author2 Hogan, Robert
author_facet Hogan, Robert
Dunphy, James
author Dunphy, James
author_sort Dunphy, James
title Gay-Marriage in 2004 U.S. Presidential Election
title_short Gay-Marriage in 2004 U.S. Presidential Election
title_full Gay-Marriage in 2004 U.S. Presidential Election
title_fullStr Gay-Marriage in 2004 U.S. Presidential Election
title_full_unstemmed Gay-Marriage in 2004 U.S. Presidential Election
title_sort gay-marriage in 2004 u.s. presidential election
publisher LSU
publishDate 2011
url http://etd.lsu.edu/docs/available/etd-04272011-155810/
work_keys_str_mv AT dunphyjames gaymarriagein2004uspresidentialelection
_version_ 1716478065955045376