| Summary: | Thesis (Ph.D.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, 1999. === Includes bibliographical references (p. 119-124). === This electronic version was submitted by the student author. The certified thesis is available in the Institute Archives and Special Collections. === Harmonic balance (HB) methods are frequency-domain algorithms used for high accuracy computation of the periodic steady-state of circuits. Matrix-implicit Krylov-subspace techniques have made it possible for these methods to simulate large circuits more efficiently. However, the harmonic balance methods are not so efficient in computing steady-state solutions of strongly nonlinear circuits with rapid transitions. While the time-domain shooting-Newton methods can handle these problems, the low-order integration methods typically used with shooting-Newton methods are inefficient when high solution accuracy is required. We first examine possible enhancements to the standard state-of-the-art preconditioned matrix-implicit Krylovsubspace HB method. We formulate the BDF time-domain preconditioners and show that they can be quite effective for strongly nonlinear circuits, speeding up the HB runtimes by several times compared to using the frequency-domain block-diagonal preconditioner. Also, an approximate Galerkin HB formulation is derived, yielding a small improvement in accuracy over the standard pseudospectral HB formulation, and about a factor of 1.5 runtime speedup in runs reaching identical solution error. Next, we introduce and develop the Time-Mapped Harmonic Balance method (TMHB) as a fast Krylov-subspace spectral method that overcomes the inefficiency of standard harmonic balance for circuits with rapid transitions. TMHB features a non-uniform grid and a time-map function to resolve the sharp features in the signals. At the core of the TMHB method is the notion of pseudo Fourier approximations. The rapid transitions in the solution waveforms are well approximated with pseudo Fourier interpolants, whose building blocks are complex exponential basis functions with smoothly varying frequencies. The TMHB features a matrix-implicit Krylov-subspace solution approach of same complexity as the standard harmonic balance method. As the TMHB solution is computed in a pseudo domain, we give a procedure for computing the real Fourier coefficients of the solution, and we also detail the construction of the time-map function. The convergence properties of TMHB are analyzed and demonstrated on analytic waveforms. The success of TMHB is critically dependent on the selection of a non-uniform grid. Two grid selection strategies, direct and iterative, are introduced and studied. Both strategies are a priori schemes, and are designed to obey accuracy and stability requirements. Practical issues associated with their use are also addressed. Results of applying the TMHB method on several circuit examples demonstrate that the TMHB method achieves up to five orders of magnitude improvement in accuracy compared to the standard harmonic balance method. The solution error in TMHB decays exponentially faster than the standard HB method when the size of the Fourier basis increases linearly. The TMHB method is also up to six times faster than the standard harmonic balance method in reaching identical solution accuracy, and uses up to five times less computer memory. The TMHB runtime speedup factor and storage savings favorably increase for stricter accuracy requirements, making TMHB well suited for high accuracy simulations of large strongly nonlinear circuits with rapid transitions. === by Ognen J. Nastov. === Ph.D.
|
|---|
