Ways of contending : community organizing and development in neighborhood context

Thesis (Ph. D.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Urban Studies and Planning, 2004. === "September 2004." === Includes bibliographical references (p. 181-184). === This thesis explores community organizing by Community Development Corporations (CDCs), the different outcomes...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Greenberg, David Micah, 1972-
Other Authors: Langley C. Keyes.
Format: Others
Language:en_US
Published: Massachusetts Institute of Technology 2005
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/28787
id ndltd-MIT-oai-dspace.mit.edu-1721.1-28787
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-MIT-oai-dspace.mit.edu-1721.1-287872019-05-02T15:57:05Z Ways of contending : community organizing and development in neighborhood context Greenberg, David Micah, 1972- Langley C. Keyes. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Urban Studies and Planning. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Urban Studies and Planning. Urban Studies and Planning. Thesis (Ph. D.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Urban Studies and Planning, 2004. "September 2004." Includes bibliographical references (p. 181-184). This thesis explores community organizing by Community Development Corporations (CDCs), the different outcomes achieved by organizing campaigns, and the factors that contribute to their successes and failures. Among organizing outcomes, I focus not only on policy victories and physical or economic improvements to communities, but also on the ways that collective action produces changes in local political institutions. Using rich qualitative and extensive quantitative data from organizing campaigns by ten CDCs, I show how claims about the role of racial and ethnic difference in community, and about the need for conflict in creating community change, find acceptance or resistance from political institutions. While institutional resistance to a campaign's claims about community makes it more difficult for campaigns to succeed, this resistance also indicates the possibility that successful organizing will enact changes to local institutions. I find that CDCs won campaigns (and with success, enacted some type of impact on political institutions) by coordinating mobilization throughout their activities and departments, and by including activists in governance and decision-making. by David Micah Greenberg. Ph.D. 2005-09-27T18:20:26Z 2005-09-27T18:20:26Z 2004 Thesis http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/28787 60248687 en_US M.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission. http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582 184 p. 11809119 bytes 11832645 bytes application/pdf application/pdf application/pdf Massachusetts Institute of Technology
collection NDLTD
language en_US
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Urban Studies and Planning.
spellingShingle Urban Studies and Planning.
Greenberg, David Micah, 1972-
Ways of contending : community organizing and development in neighborhood context
description Thesis (Ph. D.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Urban Studies and Planning, 2004. === "September 2004." === Includes bibliographical references (p. 181-184). === This thesis explores community organizing by Community Development Corporations (CDCs), the different outcomes achieved by organizing campaigns, and the factors that contribute to their successes and failures. Among organizing outcomes, I focus not only on policy victories and physical or economic improvements to communities, but also on the ways that collective action produces changes in local political institutions. Using rich qualitative and extensive quantitative data from organizing campaigns by ten CDCs, I show how claims about the role of racial and ethnic difference in community, and about the need for conflict in creating community change, find acceptance or resistance from political institutions. While institutional resistance to a campaign's claims about community makes it more difficult for campaigns to succeed, this resistance also indicates the possibility that successful organizing will enact changes to local institutions. I find that CDCs won campaigns (and with success, enacted some type of impact on political institutions) by coordinating mobilization throughout their activities and departments, and by including activists in governance and decision-making. === by David Micah Greenberg. === Ph.D.
author2 Langley C. Keyes.
author_facet Langley C. Keyes.
Greenberg, David Micah, 1972-
author Greenberg, David Micah, 1972-
author_sort Greenberg, David Micah, 1972-
title Ways of contending : community organizing and development in neighborhood context
title_short Ways of contending : community organizing and development in neighborhood context
title_full Ways of contending : community organizing and development in neighborhood context
title_fullStr Ways of contending : community organizing and development in neighborhood context
title_full_unstemmed Ways of contending : community organizing and development in neighborhood context
title_sort ways of contending : community organizing and development in neighborhood context
publisher Massachusetts Institute of Technology
publishDate 2005
url http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/28787
work_keys_str_mv AT greenbergdavidmicah1972 waysofcontendingcommunityorganizinganddevelopmentinneighborhoodcontext
_version_ 1719031744118652928