The value of flexible design : real estate investment and development strategy under uncertainty
Thesis (S.M. in Architectural Studies; and, S.M. in Real Estate Development)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Architecture, 2003. === Includes bibliographical references (p. 133-137). === Utilizing recent research into building life cycle analysis and option valuation theory, this th...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Others |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
2006
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/29773 |
id |
ndltd-MIT-oai-dspace.mit.edu-1721.1-29773 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-MIT-oai-dspace.mit.edu-1721.1-297732019-05-02T16:30:41Z The value of flexible design : real estate investment and development strategy under uncertainty Loomis, Benjamin A. (Benjamin Alan), 1971- William L. Porter and David Geltner. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Architecture. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Architecture. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Center for Real Estate. Architecture. Thesis (S.M. in Architectural Studies; and, S.M. in Real Estate Development)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Architecture, 2003. Includes bibliographical references (p. 133-137). Utilizing recent research into building life cycle analysis and option valuation theory, this thesis develops an architectural methodology for analyzing buildings' "capacity for change," and economic models for valuing this capacity. Together these can be used to evaluate strategies for the design, investment, and development of new and existing buildings. Two hypothetical case studies illustrate the methods and models, and produce results which challenge conventional wisdom. One case study suggests that including a redevelopment option can increase the valuation of moderately performing assets by up to 25% over conventional discounted cash flow analysis, even when redevelopment is not economically feasible in the near term. The other case study fInds that when zoning allows, the design and construction of a building which can flexibly switch between multiple uses can be economically viable, even when substantial additional costs are incurred. by Benjamin A. Loomis. S.M.in Architectural Studies; and, S.M.in Real Estate Development 2006-03-24T16:24:06Z 2006-03-24T16:24:06Z 2003 2003 Thesis http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/29773 54755361 eng M.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission. http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582 145 p. 7484550 bytes 7484357 bytes application/pdf application/pdf application/pdf Massachusetts Institute of Technology |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
English |
format |
Others
|
sources |
NDLTD |
topic |
Architecture. |
spellingShingle |
Architecture. Loomis, Benjamin A. (Benjamin Alan), 1971- The value of flexible design : real estate investment and development strategy under uncertainty |
description |
Thesis (S.M. in Architectural Studies; and, S.M. in Real Estate Development)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Architecture, 2003. === Includes bibliographical references (p. 133-137). === Utilizing recent research into building life cycle analysis and option valuation theory, this thesis develops an architectural methodology for analyzing buildings' "capacity for change," and economic models for valuing this capacity. Together these can be used to evaluate strategies for the design, investment, and development of new and existing buildings. Two hypothetical case studies illustrate the methods and models, and produce results which challenge conventional wisdom. One case study suggests that including a redevelopment option can increase the valuation of moderately performing assets by up to 25% over conventional discounted cash flow analysis, even when redevelopment is not economically feasible in the near term. The other case study fInds that when zoning allows, the design and construction of a building which can flexibly switch between multiple uses can be economically viable, even when substantial additional costs are incurred. === by Benjamin A. Loomis. === S.M.in Architectural Studies; and, S.M.in Real Estate Development |
author2 |
William L. Porter and David Geltner. |
author_facet |
William L. Porter and David Geltner. Loomis, Benjamin A. (Benjamin Alan), 1971- |
author |
Loomis, Benjamin A. (Benjamin Alan), 1971- |
author_sort |
Loomis, Benjamin A. (Benjamin Alan), 1971- |
title |
The value of flexible design : real estate investment and development strategy under uncertainty |
title_short |
The value of flexible design : real estate investment and development strategy under uncertainty |
title_full |
The value of flexible design : real estate investment and development strategy under uncertainty |
title_fullStr |
The value of flexible design : real estate investment and development strategy under uncertainty |
title_full_unstemmed |
The value of flexible design : real estate investment and development strategy under uncertainty |
title_sort |
value of flexible design : real estate investment and development strategy under uncertainty |
publisher |
Massachusetts Institute of Technology |
publishDate |
2006 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/29773 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT loomisbenjaminabenjaminalan1971 thevalueofflexibledesignrealestateinvestmentanddevelopmentstrategyunderuncertainty AT loomisbenjaminabenjaminalan1971 valueofflexibledesignrealestateinvestmentanddevelopmentstrategyunderuncertainty |
_version_ |
1719041799539916800 |