Mechanical testing of rapid-prototyping refractory ceramic print media

Thesis: S.B., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, February 2013. === Page 30 blank. Cataloged from PDF version of thesis. === Includes bibliographical references. === Additively manufactured (3D-printed) refractory alumina-silica ceramics were mech...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Martin, Rachel (Rachel M.)
Other Authors: Samuel M. Allen and James F. Bredt.
Format: Others
Language:English
Published: Massachusetts Institute of Technology 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/86278
id ndltd-MIT-oai-dspace.mit.edu-1721.1-86278
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-MIT-oai-dspace.mit.edu-1721.1-862782019-05-02T16:18:41Z Mechanical testing of rapid-prototyping refractory ceramic print media Martin, Rachel (Rachel M.) Samuel M. Allen and James F. Bredt. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Materials Science and Engineering. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Materials Science and Engineering. Materials Science and Engineering. Thesis: S.B., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, February 2013. Page 30 blank. Cataloged from PDF version of thesis. Includes bibliographical references. Additively manufactured (3D-printed) refractory alumina-silica ceramics were mechanically tested to ascertain their ultimate tensile strengths and observed to determine their dimensional consistency over the printing and post-printing process. The equipment used to perform tensile testing was designed and built for use with custom-designed tensile test samples. Two ceramic powders, V18 (electronic-grade alumina, colloidal silica, and organic content) and 403C (200-mesh mullite, organic content, and magnesium oxide), were printed into test samples on ZCorporation ZPrinter® 310 and 510 machines, before being infiltrated with tetraethylorthosilicate (TEaS), and in some cases infiltrated again with a 40% by weight suspension of silica in water (Ludox). Ludox-infiltrated V18 proved to be the strongest medium, with a UTS of 4.539 ± 1.008 MPa; non-Ludox-infiltrated V18 had a UTS of 2.071 ± 0.443 MPA; Ludox-infiltrated 403C was weakest with a UTS of 1.378 ± 0.526 MPa. Within V18, greater silica content lead to greater tensile strength, but this did not hold true for 403C. 403C displayed volumetric shrinkage of about 1.5%, while V18's volumetric shrinkage ranged from 7% to 14%. by Rachel Martin. S.B. 2014-04-25T15:48:33Z 2014-04-25T15:48:33Z 2012 2013 Thesis http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/86278 874659927 eng M.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission. http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582 31 pages application/pdf Massachusetts Institute of Technology
collection NDLTD
language English
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Materials Science and Engineering.
spellingShingle Materials Science and Engineering.
Martin, Rachel (Rachel M.)
Mechanical testing of rapid-prototyping refractory ceramic print media
description Thesis: S.B., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, February 2013. === Page 30 blank. Cataloged from PDF version of thesis. === Includes bibliographical references. === Additively manufactured (3D-printed) refractory alumina-silica ceramics were mechanically tested to ascertain their ultimate tensile strengths and observed to determine their dimensional consistency over the printing and post-printing process. The equipment used to perform tensile testing was designed and built for use with custom-designed tensile test samples. Two ceramic powders, V18 (electronic-grade alumina, colloidal silica, and organic content) and 403C (200-mesh mullite, organic content, and magnesium oxide), were printed into test samples on ZCorporation ZPrinter® 310 and 510 machines, before being infiltrated with tetraethylorthosilicate (TEaS), and in some cases infiltrated again with a 40% by weight suspension of silica in water (Ludox). Ludox-infiltrated V18 proved to be the strongest medium, with a UTS of 4.539 ± 1.008 MPa; non-Ludox-infiltrated V18 had a UTS of 2.071 ± 0.443 MPA; Ludox-infiltrated 403C was weakest with a UTS of 1.378 ± 0.526 MPa. Within V18, greater silica content lead to greater tensile strength, but this did not hold true for 403C. 403C displayed volumetric shrinkage of about 1.5%, while V18's volumetric shrinkage ranged from 7% to 14%. === by Rachel Martin. === S.B.
author2 Samuel M. Allen and James F. Bredt.
author_facet Samuel M. Allen and James F. Bredt.
Martin, Rachel (Rachel M.)
author Martin, Rachel (Rachel M.)
author_sort Martin, Rachel (Rachel M.)
title Mechanical testing of rapid-prototyping refractory ceramic print media
title_short Mechanical testing of rapid-prototyping refractory ceramic print media
title_full Mechanical testing of rapid-prototyping refractory ceramic print media
title_fullStr Mechanical testing of rapid-prototyping refractory ceramic print media
title_full_unstemmed Mechanical testing of rapid-prototyping refractory ceramic print media
title_sort mechanical testing of rapid-prototyping refractory ceramic print media
publisher Massachusetts Institute of Technology
publishDate 2014
url http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/86278
work_keys_str_mv AT martinrachelrachelm mechanicaltestingofrapidprototypingrefractoryceramicprintmedia
_version_ 1719038623508070400