Drawing on architecture : the socioaesthetics of architectural drawings, 1970-1990

Thesis: Ph. D., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Architecture, February 2015. === Cataloged from PDF version of thesis. === Includes bibliographical references (pages 391-422). === This dissertation examines a period in the late twentieth century when architectural drawings provo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Kauffman, Jordan Scott
Other Authors: Mark Jarzombek.
Format: Others
Language:English
Published: Massachusetts Institute of Technology 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/97376
id ndltd-MIT-oai-dspace.mit.edu-1721.1-97376
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-MIT-oai-dspace.mit.edu-1721.1-973762019-05-02T16:12:34Z Drawing on architecture : the socioaesthetics of architectural drawings, 1970-1990 Socioaesthetics of architectural drawings, 1970-1990 Kauffman, Jordan Scott Mark Jarzombek. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Architecture. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Architecture. Architecture. Thesis: Ph. D., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Architecture, February 2015. Cataloged from PDF version of thesis. Includes bibliographical references (pages 391-422). This dissertation examines a period in the late twentieth century when architectural drawings provoked a profound re-evaluation of architecture. It does so through novel research of the individuals, galleries, institutions, and events-and the networks that originated therefrom-that drove this reappraisal by shifting the perception of architectural drawings. During the 1970s and 1980s, for the first time, architectural drawings became more than an instrument for building. Prior to this period, except for scattered instances, buildings were considered to be the goal of architectural practice; architectural drawings were viewed simply as a means to an end. However, through a confluence of factors architectural drawings emerged from this marginal role. Drawings attained autonomy from the architectural process and were ultimately perceived as aesthetic artifacts in and of themselves. No attention has been given to this shift, and recovering this period's forgotten history reveals a rich and complex tapestry. Research unearths interrelated individuals, galleries, institutions, and events outside of practice that impacted the perception of architectural drawings during this period. This reveals the uniqueness of this period, for at no other time was debate generated in the same way, since at no other time did the necessary structures exist to support this change. During this period, architectural drawings became the driving force of architectural debate, not for what architects put in them, but for what others asked them to be and saw in them. Through exhibitions that emphasized drawings in and of themselves, through collectors and galleries, through the development of a market for architectural drawings, and through the interrelation of these, all of which this work reconstructs for the first time, the role and perception of drawings fell between and among aesthetic, artistic, architectural, commercial, conceptual, cultural, and historical understandings. It was this shifting that drove questioning during this period of nearly all facets of architecture. by Jordan Scott Kauffman. Ph. D. 2015-06-10T19:15:22Z 2015-06-10T19:15:22Z 2014 2015 Thesis http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/97376 910739049 eng M.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission. http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582 422 pages application/pdf Massachusetts Institute of Technology
collection NDLTD
language English
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Architecture.
spellingShingle Architecture.
Kauffman, Jordan Scott
Drawing on architecture : the socioaesthetics of architectural drawings, 1970-1990
description Thesis: Ph. D., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Architecture, February 2015. === Cataloged from PDF version of thesis. === Includes bibliographical references (pages 391-422). === This dissertation examines a period in the late twentieth century when architectural drawings provoked a profound re-evaluation of architecture. It does so through novel research of the individuals, galleries, institutions, and events-and the networks that originated therefrom-that drove this reappraisal by shifting the perception of architectural drawings. During the 1970s and 1980s, for the first time, architectural drawings became more than an instrument for building. Prior to this period, except for scattered instances, buildings were considered to be the goal of architectural practice; architectural drawings were viewed simply as a means to an end. However, through a confluence of factors architectural drawings emerged from this marginal role. Drawings attained autonomy from the architectural process and were ultimately perceived as aesthetic artifacts in and of themselves. No attention has been given to this shift, and recovering this period's forgotten history reveals a rich and complex tapestry. Research unearths interrelated individuals, galleries, institutions, and events outside of practice that impacted the perception of architectural drawings during this period. This reveals the uniqueness of this period, for at no other time was debate generated in the same way, since at no other time did the necessary structures exist to support this change. During this period, architectural drawings became the driving force of architectural debate, not for what architects put in them, but for what others asked them to be and saw in them. Through exhibitions that emphasized drawings in and of themselves, through collectors and galleries, through the development of a market for architectural drawings, and through the interrelation of these, all of which this work reconstructs for the first time, the role and perception of drawings fell between and among aesthetic, artistic, architectural, commercial, conceptual, cultural, and historical understandings. It was this shifting that drove questioning during this period of nearly all facets of architecture. === by Jordan Scott Kauffman. === Ph. D.
author2 Mark Jarzombek.
author_facet Mark Jarzombek.
Kauffman, Jordan Scott
author Kauffman, Jordan Scott
author_sort Kauffman, Jordan Scott
title Drawing on architecture : the socioaesthetics of architectural drawings, 1970-1990
title_short Drawing on architecture : the socioaesthetics of architectural drawings, 1970-1990
title_full Drawing on architecture : the socioaesthetics of architectural drawings, 1970-1990
title_fullStr Drawing on architecture : the socioaesthetics of architectural drawings, 1970-1990
title_full_unstemmed Drawing on architecture : the socioaesthetics of architectural drawings, 1970-1990
title_sort drawing on architecture : the socioaesthetics of architectural drawings, 1970-1990
publisher Massachusetts Institute of Technology
publishDate 2015
url http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/97376
work_keys_str_mv AT kauffmanjordanscott drawingonarchitecturethesocioaestheticsofarchitecturaldrawings19701990
AT kauffmanjordanscott socioaestheticsofarchitecturaldrawings19701990
_version_ 1719036638138466304