| Summary: | Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a long-standing issue that has recently been investigated as a
significant social and interpersonal problem. Research has suggested that psychological abuse is
both more prevalent and more devastating to victims, as compared to physical violence. While
there remains no true consensus as to the definition of psychological abuse, a current
conceptualization typifies psychological abuse into four groups of acts that are meant to
(a)denigrate and damage a partners self-esteem, (b) withhold nurturing and support, (c) both
explicitly and implicitly threaten, and (d) restrict personal freedom. It is hypothesized that an analysis of existing measures of IPV will find the four proposed distinct groups of psychological
abuse and one distinct group of physical violence. By controlling for physical violence, it is
hypothesized that the four proposed groups of nonphysical abuse will each individually account
for more variance in trauma symptoms than physical violence alone. Two hundred and fifty two
volunteers from the greater Missoula community who experienced or were experiencing violence
in their relationship participated in this study. All participants completed a semi-structured
interview, the Conflict Tactics Scale (Straus & Gelles, 1979), the Psychological Maltreatment of
Women Inventory (Tolman, 1989), and the Trauma Symptoms Checklist (TSC-33, Briere & Runtz, 1989). An exploratory factor analysis was conducted to investigate the fit of all items of the measures of emotional abuse to Maiuros conceptualization. Five distinct forms of abuse were found: emotional control and restriction of resources; denigration and damage to partners self-image or esteem; restriction of social outlets; the abusive partners self-centered manipulation tactic, and physical threats and violence. A hierarchical regression found that emotional control and restriction of access to resources was the only significant form of nonphysical abuse contributing to trauma. This suggests that an abusers efforts to isolate a victim from their children, control the household and finances, and block the victims access to care is a significantly traumatizing experience. Results have implications for the importance of investigating, assessing and treating forms of emotional abuse that include isolation, control, and restriction of resources for women in violent relationships.
|
|---|
