Exploring universal phonological preferences: beyond articulation.

Across languages, certain syllable types (e.g., black) are systematically preferred to others (e.g., lback). Specifically, syllables like blif are preferred to bnif, which, in turn, are preferred to bdif; least preferred are syllables like lbif. Such preferences have been documented experimentally a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/2047/D20200551
Description
Summary:Across languages, certain syllable types (e.g., black) are systematically preferred to others (e.g., lback). Specifically, syllables like blif are preferred to bnif, which, in turn, are preferred to bdif; least preferred are syllables like lbif. Such preferences have been documented experimentally among speakers of English, Korean, Spanish, French, Hebrew, Mandarin, even when none of these syllable types exists in their language. Previous research demonstrated that these preferences are unlikely due to the auditory/phonetic demands of auditory materials, as they obtain even when items are presented in print. However, it remains possible that they might be informed by articulatory demands.