Decoy Effects in a Consumer Search Task

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Hartzler, Beth Marie
Language:English
Published: Bowling Green State University / OhioLINK 2012
Subjects:
Online Access:http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=bgsu1332887766
id ndltd-OhioLink-oai-etd.ohiolink.edu-bgsu1332887766
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-OhioLink-oai-etd.ohiolink.edu-bgsu13328877662021-08-03T05:29:51Z Decoy Effects in a Consumer Search Task Hartzler, Beth Marie Cognitive Psychology consumer behavior judgment and decision making decoy effect Research by Huber, Payne, and Puto (1982) revealed that the addition of a third alternative to a choice set can lead to a redistribution of the choice probabilities for the two existing alternatives, such that one alternative that had not previously been preferred over the other becomes the favored alternative. The results of that study violated both the principles of regularity and similarity, and these findings have since been replicated in numerous studies. The present research was designed to address a potential limitation of these previous studies. Specifically, to the author's knowledge, no study had yet examined the effect of introducing a decoy alternative to a choice set after the other alternatives have already been presented. This tendency to present all alternatives simultaneously may be a significant limitation for two reasons. First, there is an issue of ecological representativeness: In an actual shopper's experience, all relevant products are not typically available concurrently. Second, studies of non-instrumental information search indicate that the relative weighting of information may depend on how and when the information was obtained with participants typically placing greater weight on the newly acquired information. Thus there are theoretical grounds to expect a decoy to have different effects on choice, depending on whether the decoy occurs concurrently with, or subsequent to, the other alternatives. In the work reported herein, the effect of inviting or directing participants to search for an asymmetrically dominated decoy alternative was examined to determine whether the act of searching for a third alternative influences participants' preference for the available alternatives. In the present research, participants were more likely to select the asymmetrically dominated alternative when they had been given the option to search for that alternative than were participants who either had the same alternative shown to them immediately, or participants who were directed to search for the third alternative. In general, these findings replicated the results of previous studies, in that the addition of a third, inferior alternative to a choice set led to a significant preference for one alternative over the other. However, this same preference shift was not evident when participants sought out the inferior alternative, either voluntarily or when directed to do so. 2012-04-04 English text Bowling Green State University / OhioLINK http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=bgsu1332887766 http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=bgsu1332887766 unrestricted This thesis or dissertation is protected by copyright: all rights reserved. It may not be copied or redistributed beyond the terms of applicable copyright laws.
collection NDLTD
language English
sources NDLTD
topic Cognitive Psychology
consumer behavior
judgment and decision making
decoy effect
spellingShingle Cognitive Psychology
consumer behavior
judgment and decision making
decoy effect
Hartzler, Beth Marie
Decoy Effects in a Consumer Search Task
author Hartzler, Beth Marie
author_facet Hartzler, Beth Marie
author_sort Hartzler, Beth Marie
title Decoy Effects in a Consumer Search Task
title_short Decoy Effects in a Consumer Search Task
title_full Decoy Effects in a Consumer Search Task
title_fullStr Decoy Effects in a Consumer Search Task
title_full_unstemmed Decoy Effects in a Consumer Search Task
title_sort decoy effects in a consumer search task
publisher Bowling Green State University / OhioLINK
publishDate 2012
url http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=bgsu1332887766
work_keys_str_mv AT hartzlerbethmarie decoyeffectsinaconsumersearchtask
_version_ 1719420924600516608