Talking in circles| A mixed methods study of school-wide restorative practices in two urban middle schools

<p> This mixed methods, multisite case study examined the relational ecology of two urban middle schools that had adopted school-wide restorative practices (SWRPs) and the changes that occurred as a result of the reform initiative. The study was conducted in two Title I middle schools in the O...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Brown, Martha A.
Language:EN
Published: Florida Atlantic University 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:http://pqdtopen.proquest.com/#viewpdf?dispub=10154934
id ndltd-PROQUEST-oai-pqdtoai.proquest.com-10154934
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-PROQUEST-oai-pqdtoai.proquest.com-101549342016-09-15T15:58:09Z Talking in circles| A mixed methods study of school-wide restorative practices in two urban middle schools Brown, Martha A. Middle school education|Multicultural Education|Pedagogy|Education policy|Educational administration <p> This mixed methods, multisite case study examined the relational ecology of two urban middle schools that had adopted school-wide restorative practices (SWRPs) and the changes that occurred as a result of the reform initiative. The study was conducted in two Title I middle schools in the Oakland Unified School District in California. A positive relational ecology existed in these two urban middle schools which was built on the interacting and interrelated themes of relational trust, being heard, a relational-based, student-centered culture, and a commitment to the principles of social justice. The positive relational ecology created a strong foundation upon which change could occur at the organizational, individual, and pedagogical levels. Various structures within the schools, including circles, instructional leadership teams, student councils, and peer mediation, created space for teachers and students to be heard and empowered, which subsequently facilitated change and growth for many administrators, teachers, and students. High turnover, lack of initial and ongoing training, and the development of quasi- or non-restorative processes jeopardized program fidelity. Findings revealed that in these restorative schools, relational ecology and change were inseparable, and that they moved and influenced each other. A positive relational ecology created an environment that enabled leaders and staff to feel safe as they embarked on the journey of change. Changes in the ways that members of the school communities related to each other on a daily basis provided additional motivation to continue the change effort, and these changes then in turn strengthened the relational ecologies. Findings of this study are significant and have implications for schools and school districts, policy makers, and teacher and leader education. Future research should include longitudinal, mixed methods studies that assess the school culture before and after implementing SWRPs, as well as experimental or quasi-experimental designs that compare restorative and non-restorative schools. Such studies may provide more empirical evidence that links healthy relational ecologies to student achievement, less teacher turnover, decreased conflict, and healthier communities, thereby strengthening the case for rejecting punitive and discriminatory zero tolerance school discipline policies and adopting restorative justice in education instead.</p> Florida Atlantic University 2016-09-10 00:00:00.0 thesis http://pqdtopen.proquest.com/#viewpdf?dispub=10154934 EN
collection NDLTD
language EN
sources NDLTD
topic Middle school education|Multicultural Education|Pedagogy|Education policy|Educational administration
spellingShingle Middle school education|Multicultural Education|Pedagogy|Education policy|Educational administration
Brown, Martha A.
Talking in circles| A mixed methods study of school-wide restorative practices in two urban middle schools
description <p> This mixed methods, multisite case study examined the relational ecology of two urban middle schools that had adopted school-wide restorative practices (SWRPs) and the changes that occurred as a result of the reform initiative. The study was conducted in two Title I middle schools in the Oakland Unified School District in California. A positive relational ecology existed in these two urban middle schools which was built on the interacting and interrelated themes of relational trust, being heard, a relational-based, student-centered culture, and a commitment to the principles of social justice. The positive relational ecology created a strong foundation upon which change could occur at the organizational, individual, and pedagogical levels. Various structures within the schools, including circles, instructional leadership teams, student councils, and peer mediation, created space for teachers and students to be heard and empowered, which subsequently facilitated change and growth for many administrators, teachers, and students. High turnover, lack of initial and ongoing training, and the development of quasi- or non-restorative processes jeopardized program fidelity. Findings revealed that in these restorative schools, relational ecology and change were inseparable, and that they moved and influenced each other. A positive relational ecology created an environment that enabled leaders and staff to feel safe as they embarked on the journey of change. Changes in the ways that members of the school communities related to each other on a daily basis provided additional motivation to continue the change effort, and these changes then in turn strengthened the relational ecologies. Findings of this study are significant and have implications for schools and school districts, policy makers, and teacher and leader education. Future research should include longitudinal, mixed methods studies that assess the school culture before and after implementing SWRPs, as well as experimental or quasi-experimental designs that compare restorative and non-restorative schools. Such studies may provide more empirical evidence that links healthy relational ecologies to student achievement, less teacher turnover, decreased conflict, and healthier communities, thereby strengthening the case for rejecting punitive and discriminatory zero tolerance school discipline policies and adopting restorative justice in education instead.</p>
author Brown, Martha A.
author_facet Brown, Martha A.
author_sort Brown, Martha A.
title Talking in circles| A mixed methods study of school-wide restorative practices in two urban middle schools
title_short Talking in circles| A mixed methods study of school-wide restorative practices in two urban middle schools
title_full Talking in circles| A mixed methods study of school-wide restorative practices in two urban middle schools
title_fullStr Talking in circles| A mixed methods study of school-wide restorative practices in two urban middle schools
title_full_unstemmed Talking in circles| A mixed methods study of school-wide restorative practices in two urban middle schools
title_sort talking in circles| a mixed methods study of school-wide restorative practices in two urban middle schools
publisher Florida Atlantic University
publishDate 2016
url http://pqdtopen.proquest.com/#viewpdf?dispub=10154934
work_keys_str_mv AT brownmarthaa talkingincirclesamixedmethodsstudyofschoolwiderestorativepracticesintwourbanmiddleschools
_version_ 1718384217418629120