Dot Counting Test cross-validation
<p> The purpose of this study was to determine the reliability and validity of the Dot Counting Test as a measure of feigned cognitive performance. Archival neuropsychological test data from a “real world” sample of 147 credible and 328 non-credible patients were compared....
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Language: | EN |
Published: |
Alliant International University
2017
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://pqdtopen.proquest.com/#viewpdf?dispub=10249120 |
id |
ndltd-PROQUEST-oai-pqdtoai.proquest.com-10249120 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-PROQUEST-oai-pqdtoai.proquest.com-102491202017-05-18T16:11:27Z Dot Counting Test cross-validation McCaul, Courtney Ann Clinical psychology|Quantitative psychology <p> The purpose of this study was to determine the reliability and validity of the Dot Counting Test as a measure of feigned cognitive performance. Archival neuropsychological test data from a “real world” sample of 147 credible and 328 non-credible patients were compared. The Dot Counting Test E-score cutoff of ≥ 17 continued to show excellent specificity (93%). However, sensitivity dropped from approximately 74% documented in 2002 to 51% in the current sample. When the cutoff was lowered to ≥ 15, adequate specificity was maintained (90%) and sensitivity rose to (61%). However, a third of credible patients with borderline IQ failed the test using the Dot Counting Test E-cutoff score, indicating cautious use of the test with individuals who likely have borderline intelligence.</p><p> Alliant International University 2017-05-12 00:00:00.0 thesis http://pqdtopen.proquest.com/#viewpdf?dispub=10249120 EN |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
EN |
sources |
NDLTD |
topic |
Clinical psychology|Quantitative psychology |
spellingShingle |
Clinical psychology|Quantitative psychology McCaul, Courtney Ann Dot Counting Test cross-validation |
description |
<p> The purpose of this study was to determine the reliability and validity of the Dot Counting Test as a measure of feigned cognitive performance. Archival neuropsychological test data from a “real world” sample of 147 credible and 328 non-credible patients were compared. The Dot Counting Test E-score cutoff of ≥ 17 continued to show excellent specificity (93%). However, sensitivity dropped from approximately 74% documented in 2002 to 51% in the current sample. When the cutoff was lowered to ≥ 15, adequate specificity was maintained (90%) and sensitivity rose to (61%). However, a third of credible patients with borderline IQ failed the test using the Dot Counting Test E-cutoff score, indicating cautious use of the test with individuals who likely have borderline intelligence.</p><p> |
author |
McCaul, Courtney Ann |
author_facet |
McCaul, Courtney Ann |
author_sort |
McCaul, Courtney Ann |
title |
Dot Counting Test cross-validation |
title_short |
Dot Counting Test cross-validation |
title_full |
Dot Counting Test cross-validation |
title_fullStr |
Dot Counting Test cross-validation |
title_full_unstemmed |
Dot Counting Test cross-validation |
title_sort |
dot counting test cross-validation |
publisher |
Alliant International University |
publishDate |
2017 |
url |
http://pqdtopen.proquest.com/#viewpdf?dispub=10249120 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT mccaulcourtneyann dotcountingtestcrossvalidation |
_version_ |
1718449592836554752 |