Dot Counting Test cross-validation

<p> The purpose of this study was to determine the reliability and validity of the Dot Counting Test as a measure of feigned cognitive performance. Archival neuropsychological test data from a &ldquo;real world&rdquo; sample of 147 credible and 328 non-credible patients were compared....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: McCaul, Courtney Ann
Language:EN
Published: Alliant International University 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:http://pqdtopen.proquest.com/#viewpdf?dispub=10249120
id ndltd-PROQUEST-oai-pqdtoai.proquest.com-10249120
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-PROQUEST-oai-pqdtoai.proquest.com-102491202017-05-18T16:11:27Z Dot Counting Test cross-validation McCaul, Courtney Ann Clinical psychology|Quantitative psychology <p> The purpose of this study was to determine the reliability and validity of the Dot Counting Test as a measure of feigned cognitive performance. Archival neuropsychological test data from a &ldquo;real world&rdquo; sample of 147 credible and 328 non-credible patients were compared. The Dot Counting Test E-score cutoff of &ge; 17 continued to show excellent specificity (93%). However, sensitivity dropped from approximately 74% documented in 2002 to 51% in the current sample. When the cutoff was lowered to &ge; 15, adequate specificity was maintained (90%) and sensitivity rose to (61%). However, a third of credible patients with borderline IQ failed the test using the Dot Counting Test E-cutoff score, indicating cautious use of the test with individuals who likely have borderline intelligence.</p><p> Alliant International University 2017-05-12 00:00:00.0 thesis http://pqdtopen.proquest.com/#viewpdf?dispub=10249120 EN
collection NDLTD
language EN
sources NDLTD
topic Clinical psychology|Quantitative psychology
spellingShingle Clinical psychology|Quantitative psychology
McCaul, Courtney Ann
Dot Counting Test cross-validation
description <p> The purpose of this study was to determine the reliability and validity of the Dot Counting Test as a measure of feigned cognitive performance. Archival neuropsychological test data from a &ldquo;real world&rdquo; sample of 147 credible and 328 non-credible patients were compared. The Dot Counting Test E-score cutoff of &ge; 17 continued to show excellent specificity (93%). However, sensitivity dropped from approximately 74% documented in 2002 to 51% in the current sample. When the cutoff was lowered to &ge; 15, adequate specificity was maintained (90%) and sensitivity rose to (61%). However, a third of credible patients with borderline IQ failed the test using the Dot Counting Test E-cutoff score, indicating cautious use of the test with individuals who likely have borderline intelligence.</p><p>
author McCaul, Courtney Ann
author_facet McCaul, Courtney Ann
author_sort McCaul, Courtney Ann
title Dot Counting Test cross-validation
title_short Dot Counting Test cross-validation
title_full Dot Counting Test cross-validation
title_fullStr Dot Counting Test cross-validation
title_full_unstemmed Dot Counting Test cross-validation
title_sort dot counting test cross-validation
publisher Alliant International University
publishDate 2017
url http://pqdtopen.proquest.com/#viewpdf?dispub=10249120
work_keys_str_mv AT mccaulcourtneyann dotcountingtestcrossvalidation
_version_ 1718449592836554752