The Heterocomposicion of Collective Labor Negotiations: Analysis of Facultative Arbitration in the last few years
This article addresses the issue about the application of Facultative Arbitration and its effect on the redirection of negotiable behaviors of business and gremials organizations in order to achieve some previous agreement before they submitted to an arbitral tribunal. Furthermore, the authors compa...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Others |
| Language: | Español |
| Published: |
IUS ET VERITAS
2016
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/iusetveritas/article/view/15665/16102 http://repositorio.pucp.edu.pe/index/handle/123456789/123145 |
| Summary: | This article addresses the issue about the application of Facultative Arbitration and its effect on the redirection of negotiable behaviors of business and gremials organizations in order to achieve some previous agreement before they submitted to an arbitral tribunal. Furthermore, the authors compare the effects of the strike concept variation on the qualification of this like legal or illegal and its relationship with the emergence of Facultative Arbitration that, as an exceptional measure, complement the collective negotiation. === El presente artículo trata sobre la aplicación del Arbitraje Potestativo y su efecto en la redirección de las conductas negociales de las organizaciones gremiales y empresariales a fin de que logren un acuerdo previo antes de someterse a un tribunal arbitral. Asimismo, los autores comparan los efectos de la variación del concepto del derecho a la huelga en la calificación de esta como legal o ilegal y su relación con la aparición del Arbitraje Potestativo que, como medida excepcional, complementa la negociación colectiva. |
|---|