Be after v-ing on the past grammaticalisation path : how far is it after coming?
Content: 1. Perfect to Preterite? 2. A Past Grammaticalisation Path for Be after V-ing 2.1. Perfect Grams and Sources 2.2. Perfect Distinctions and Perfect-Preterite Evolution 3. Semantic History of Past-Time Be After V-ing 3.1. Perfect Uses, 1670-1800 3.2. Perfect Uses, 1801-2000 4. Temporal Ad...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Others |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Universität Potsdam
2006
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-40960 http://opus.kobv.de/ubp/volltexte/2010/4096/ |
Summary: | Content:
1. Perfect to Preterite?
2. A Past Grammaticalisation Path for Be after V-ing
2.1. Perfect Grams and Sources
2.2. Perfect Distinctions and Perfect-Preterite Evolution
3. Semantic History of Past-Time Be After V-ing
3.1. Perfect Uses, 1670-1800
3.2. Perfect Uses, 1801-2000
4. Temporal Adverbials and Uses of Be After V-ing, 1701-2000
4.1. Hodiernal Uses
4.2. Preterite Uses
4.3. How Far Is It after Coming?
5. Conclusion |
---|