Fracture Resistance of Non-metallic Molar Crowns Manufactured with CEREC 3D

Objectives: To compare fracture strength and fatigue resistance of ceramic (ProCAD, Ivoclar-Vivadent)(C) and resin composite (Paradigm MZ100, 3M/ ESPE)(R) crowns made with CEREC-3D. Methods: A prepared ivorine molar tooth was duplicated to produce 40 identical prepared specimens made of epoxy resin...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Madani, Dalia
Other Authors: El-Mowafy, Omar
Language:en_ca
Published: 2010
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1807/24265
id ndltd-TORONTO-oai-tspace.library.utoronto.ca-1807-24265
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-TORONTO-oai-tspace.library.utoronto.ca-1807-242652013-04-19T20:00:03ZFracture Resistance of Non-metallic Molar Crowns Manufactured with CEREC 3DMadani, DaliaCEREC 3DParadigm MZ100 crownsProCAD crownsComposite resin crowns0567Objectives: To compare fracture strength and fatigue resistance of ceramic (ProCAD, Ivoclar-Vivadent)(C) and resin composite (Paradigm MZ100, 3M/ ESPE)(R) crowns made with CEREC-3D. Methods: A prepared ivorine molar tooth was duplicated to produce 40 identical prepared specimens made of epoxy resin (Viade). Twenty (C) crowns and 20 (R) were cemented to their dies using resin cement. Ten of each group were subjected to compressive loading to fracture. The remaining 10 of each group were subjected to mechanical cyclic loading for 500,000 cycles. The survivors were subjected to compressive loading to fracture. Results: No significant difference in mean fracture load was found between the two materials. However, only 30% of the (C) crowns vs. 100% of the (R) crowns survived the cyclic loading test. Conclusions: (R) crowns demonstrated higher fatigue Resistance than (C) crowns in-vitro and might better resist cracking in-vivo.El-Mowafy, Omar2010-032010-04-06T18:05:07ZNO_RESTRICTION2010-04-06T18:05:07Z2010-04-06T18:05:07ZThesishttp://hdl.handle.net/1807/24265en_ca
collection NDLTD
language en_ca
sources NDLTD
topic CEREC 3D
Paradigm MZ100 crowns
ProCAD crowns
Composite resin crowns
0567
spellingShingle CEREC 3D
Paradigm MZ100 crowns
ProCAD crowns
Composite resin crowns
0567
Madani, Dalia
Fracture Resistance of Non-metallic Molar Crowns Manufactured with CEREC 3D
description Objectives: To compare fracture strength and fatigue resistance of ceramic (ProCAD, Ivoclar-Vivadent)(C) and resin composite (Paradigm MZ100, 3M/ ESPE)(R) crowns made with CEREC-3D. Methods: A prepared ivorine molar tooth was duplicated to produce 40 identical prepared specimens made of epoxy resin (Viade). Twenty (C) crowns and 20 (R) were cemented to their dies using resin cement. Ten of each group were subjected to compressive loading to fracture. The remaining 10 of each group were subjected to mechanical cyclic loading for 500,000 cycles. The survivors were subjected to compressive loading to fracture. Results: No significant difference in mean fracture load was found between the two materials. However, only 30% of the (C) crowns vs. 100% of the (R) crowns survived the cyclic loading test. Conclusions: (R) crowns demonstrated higher fatigue Resistance than (C) crowns in-vitro and might better resist cracking in-vivo.
author2 El-Mowafy, Omar
author_facet El-Mowafy, Omar
Madani, Dalia
author Madani, Dalia
author_sort Madani, Dalia
title Fracture Resistance of Non-metallic Molar Crowns Manufactured with CEREC 3D
title_short Fracture Resistance of Non-metallic Molar Crowns Manufactured with CEREC 3D
title_full Fracture Resistance of Non-metallic Molar Crowns Manufactured with CEREC 3D
title_fullStr Fracture Resistance of Non-metallic Molar Crowns Manufactured with CEREC 3D
title_full_unstemmed Fracture Resistance of Non-metallic Molar Crowns Manufactured with CEREC 3D
title_sort fracture resistance of non-metallic molar crowns manufactured with cerec 3d
publishDate 2010
url http://hdl.handle.net/1807/24265
work_keys_str_mv AT madanidalia fractureresistanceofnonmetallicmolarcrownsmanufacturedwithcerec3d
_version_ 1716582031208480768