| Summary: | 碩士 === 國立臺灣師範大學 === 體育學系 === 84 === A Study of the Cogitating Factors of Taking the Course of
Physical Education of Senior Students in
Taiwan Master Thesis, 1996 Yang, Jann-
long Adviser：Cheng, Chih-fu Ed.D
ABSTRACT The purpose of this study is to understand the
priority order of the cogit-ating factors of taking the course
of Physical Education of senior students inTaiwan, and to
compare the differences of the cogitating factors of senior
stud-ents of different backgrounds（ male / female, national /
private, university /college, grades of the course in the
previous years）, When taking the course ofPhysical Education.
The subjects of this study are 1,138 senior students of colleges
and unive-rsities in Taiwan which offer the course of Physical
Education who have takenthe course in the 1995 - 96 Academic
Year. A 〞Questionnaire of the CogitatingFactors of Taking the
Course of Physical Education of Senior Students in Taiwan〝 was
distributed and retrieved. The data obtained were processed with
Indepen-dent Sample t-Test , one-way ANOVA , and Scheff’e
test were utilized for dataanalysis. The findings are as the
followi：1. The priority order of the cogitating factors of
taking the course of PhysicalEducation of senior students are：
（a）Teachers,（b）Course Contents,（c）Facil-ities and
Equipment,（d）Experiences in Interest-election,（e）Course
Objectives,（f）Experiences in Grades Gained, and（g）Fun in the
Sports.2. In the degrees of importnce in the cogitting fctors of
taking the course ofPhysical Education, a significant
difference exists between the male and femaleseniors.3. In the
degrees of importnce in the " Course Contents " in taking the
courseof Physical Education, a significant difference exists
between the senior stude-nts of the national and those of the
private ones.4. In the degrees of importnce in " Course
Objectives , " " Experiences inInterest-election," "
Facilities and Equipment," " Teachers," " Course Contents,"a
significant difference exists between the senior students of the
universitiesand those of colleges.5. In the degrees of
importnce in " Course Objectives, " " Experiences inInterest-
election," " Experiences in Grades Gained, " a significant
differenceexists among the students who have gained different
grades in the previous years.
|
|---|
