The Reserch of

• Main Authors: Chen, Wei-Cheng, 陳威成
• Other Authors: Chen Yo-Kong
• Format: Others
• Language: zh-TW
• Published: 1997
• Online Access: http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/47395176557813680359

碩士 === 國立成功大學 === 建築(工程)學系 === 85 === Abstract The incentive of the private participation has become one of the important government policies that promotes urban renewal. The ways of private participation ,the legitimacy of incentive and the system of deliberation. Nevertheless, most of them lay particular stress on the discussions of urban environment. Therefore, few of the discussions raise question from point of the developers. This thesis observed the practicable of the rewards from development and investment is supposed to be the condition precedent of the private participation renewal. The general discussions in the ways of the rewards from the investment of the renewal enterprise, however, leaves the entire system out of consideration. It is necessary to discuss how to establish the pattern of assessment in renewal development. That may makes the developers to view the renewable development enterprise in the right light. At the same time, it may provide a reference for the deliberation committee and the legislation organization to have an opportunity to self- criticize its system today. This thesis starts from the point of the Taiwan''s renewal history and self-criticize the work of renewal now and past. It also tries to comprehend hoe the developers regard the renewal markets. Then, it discusses the renewal law system currently in effect, and verifies the system and the development system each other. Besides, it self- criticize the gain and loss of nowadays system and the effects on the developers. On the basis of those, I attempt to establish a pattern to assess the renewal development. On account of the differences in the renewal environments, I find that the pattern doesn''t suit all of the renewal cases. Therefore,I take Shing-I district and section in Taipei city for examples. Under the condition of renewal pattern in that base, I find : 1. The incentive zoning and the rate of investment reward from the pattern of renewal-development assessment do not correlate to each other. 2. There are deep relations between the rate of investment reward in renewal, the variation of land obtaining, the implication of deliberation system and the combination of reward and the contents of feed back. 3. It is unreasonable that "incentive zoning" is the main means in today''s system. To contract the unified upper limits is irrational as well. I hope it may provide a new point of view for the developers, the deliberation unit and the legislation organization from the concept of establishing assessment patterns in renewal development. It indeed needs overall examination into the issues of renewal envinronment.