| Summary: | 碩士 === 臺南藝術學院 === 博物館學研究所 === 89 === Among all affairs of the museum, exhibition is the most fundamental way that can manifest the function of the museum. Furthermore, design thinking of an exhibition is the key point of promoting an exhibition. The purpose of the research aims at the inner thinking of a designer, it’s problem-resolving process and the key points to influence the design of an exhibition in the museum.
To reach the purpose, the research focuses on two exhibitions in National Natural Science Museum, and trace the following problems：
（1）What are the characteristics of outer behavior model and inner recognition in designing activities of an exhibition in the museum?
（2）What are the characteristics of the exhibiton designers? What are the elements of design thinking of an exhibtion? And what is the dynamic relationship existing in designing process?
（3）In designing process, how will designer’s characteristics influence the interaction between the inner thinking and designing practice? And, what does this have to do with the active relationship?
The researcher herself not only participated in the prepared works of exhibitions in National Natural Science Museum, but observed closely of them, and she also interviewed a few designers. The data she collected had been arranged, analyzed, studied and inducted. According to the data, we conclude that：
（1）The complexity and the degree which management stratum involves in .They make the problem-resolving thinking approach of the design different.
（2）Two different designing characteristics ,including the design of an exhibition and the creation of art forms , differentiate “silent designer” from “designer”
（3）In the process of an exhibition , we conclude three main designing thinking elements, namely “people”, ”affairs” and “things” The active relationship of the three elements classify two relationship patterns “concept inlay” and “concept harmony”.
（4）The designing experience of a planner (or a designer)in addition to the difference of active relationship patterns, make the approaches of problem-resolving strategies and inner thinking different .
（5）In an exhibition-designing activity, the cause which we can go on expanding designing possibilities(or controlling the origins of designing development)may not come from the visual phenomenon. On the other hand, it is people’s subjective characteristics to differentiate “designing thinking “from “designing practice”, and sure this is the main cause to make every exhibition different.
|
|---|
