Drafting the Law of Interior Designer

• Main Authors: Cao-Chang Liu, 劉國慶
• Other Authors: none
• Format: Others
• Language: zh-TW
• Published: 2002
• Online Access: http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/65456804520911475411

碩士 === 中原大學 === 室內設計研究所 === 90 === Abstracts In the Ministry of Examination document number 09380 of 1999, it is suggested that the Ministry of the Interior establish a national licensing examination for interior designers, for the industry and its expertise are highly specialized. It is expected to have the “Regulations for Interior Construction in Buildings” after being announced for 10 years (May 2006) to transform as “Interior Designer” executes interior decoration. Hence, before the “Drafting the Law of Interior Designer” is to be legislative, there are needs to investigate related issues and research the draft. Scopes for researching Drafting the Law of Interior Designer are mainly 5 areas, people, time, place, thing, and law. However, due to the limitations in time and man power for the research. The Focus of the draft will base on “people” to analyze and compare related regulations: Architect’s Law, Professional Engineers’ Law, Regulations for Interior Construction in Buildings, and Drafting the Law for Interior Designers (Taichung version) to understand the ruled items and responsibilities of current regulations to Special Professional Experts and Technical Personnel in order to establish proper roles and responsibilities the interior designer should play in the future, as well as to serve as the initial base structure of regulation for Interior Designer Law. Purposes of this research are: (1)Compare current systems related to interior designers domestically and internationally. (2)Analyze domestic systems and regulations of Special Professional Experts and Technical Personnel. (3)Drafting the Law for Interior Designers. (4)Establish structure for future interior design research method related issues. For the empirical part of this research will focus on “interview professionals and experts” and ”professional symposium” among industries, government offices, scholars, experts and leaders in the interior related fields due to the consideration of time, manpower and issues. The information collected shall refer to analyzed regulations to inspect the reliability and validity of the Drafting the Law of Interior Designer. Major findings and conclusions are as follows: (1)From literature review to learn that Taiwan is a country with Constitutions of Five Rights. The “Special Professional Experts and Technical Personnel” rules various special technical personnel occupational management. The occupational management regulations are defined by the direct supervising units, while qualification is defined by exam as the major mean. This is different than the management system in western countries of independent three rights in “education, examination and employment”. (2)Interior Design industry is part of construction management. Therefore, in the future, the interior designer should be considered as same level of architect in the professional consideration, also to be listed the Construction Law, to well sound the building using and management system. (3)Through procedures of research method in interview experts, meeting with professionals, and interview experts after the professional meeting, finds different positions and suggestions among different designing groups in promoting Drafting the Law of Interior Designer. (4)Conclusions from the above research could be used as the base for Drafting the Law of Interior Designer. There are lacking related literature and other doubts from some experts to the drafts are possible research topics for the future. This is the base to promote Drafting the Law of Interior Designer in the future as well as to establish uniqueness of professional interior design research.