Comparison of high school physical education preservice teacher''s and student teacher''s value orientation

碩士 === 國立臺灣師範大學 === 體育學系在職進修碩士班 === 90 === Comparison of high school physical education preservice teacher’s and student teacher’s value orientation Master’s Thesis, 2002 Wang Shiu - mei...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wang Shiu-mei, 王秀梅
Other Authors: Keh Nyit Chin
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 2002
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/42315628361888130856
id ndltd-TW-090NTNU1567008
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-TW-090NTNU15670082015-10-13T10:34:08Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/42315628361888130856 Comparison of high school physical education preservice teacher''s and student teacher''s value orientation 中學職前與實習體育教師課程價值取向比較之研究 Wang Shiu-mei 王秀梅 碩士 國立臺灣師範大學 體育學系在職進修碩士班 90 Comparison of high school physical education preservice teacher’s and student teacher’s value orientation Master’s Thesis, 2002 Wang Shiu - mei Advisor: Keh Nyit Chin, Ph.D. Abstract The purpose of this study was to investigate high school physical education preservice teacher’s and student teacher’s value orientation. The five orientations in physical education curriculum were proposed by Jewett, Bain and Ennis (1995), namely disciplinary mastery (DM), learning process (LP), self-actualization (SA), social reconstruction (SR) and ecological integration (EI). The participants of this study were 121 physical education preservice teachers and 103 physical education student teachers. Five-point Likert scale of Physical Educator Value Orientation Inventory (Ennis & Chen, 1993) was used to collect data. One-way ANOVA and independent t-test were employed to analyze the difference between the two groups. The results indicated that (1) the value orientations were significantly different between preservice teachers with different background and teaching experience; (2) the value orientation was significantly different between student teachers with different background and teaching experience; (3) the value orientation was significantly different between preservice teachers and student teachers with different background. The results suggested that high school physical education preservice teachers placed high priority on SR while high school student teachers placed high priority on DM and LP. It implied that high school physical education preservice teachers focused on student learning in cooperation and team spirit while high school physical education student teachers emphasized on student learning in motor skill. Key words: physical education, preservice teacher, student teacher, value orientation Keh Nyit Chin 闕月清 2002 學位論文 ; thesis 97 zh-TW
collection NDLTD
language zh-TW
format Others
sources NDLTD
description 碩士 === 國立臺灣師範大學 === 體育學系在職進修碩士班 === 90 === Comparison of high school physical education preservice teacher’s and student teacher’s value orientation Master’s Thesis, 2002 Wang Shiu - mei Advisor: Keh Nyit Chin, Ph.D. Abstract The purpose of this study was to investigate high school physical education preservice teacher’s and student teacher’s value orientation. The five orientations in physical education curriculum were proposed by Jewett, Bain and Ennis (1995), namely disciplinary mastery (DM), learning process (LP), self-actualization (SA), social reconstruction (SR) and ecological integration (EI). The participants of this study were 121 physical education preservice teachers and 103 physical education student teachers. Five-point Likert scale of Physical Educator Value Orientation Inventory (Ennis & Chen, 1993) was used to collect data. One-way ANOVA and independent t-test were employed to analyze the difference between the two groups. The results indicated that (1) the value orientations were significantly different between preservice teachers with different background and teaching experience; (2) the value orientation was significantly different between student teachers with different background and teaching experience; (3) the value orientation was significantly different between preservice teachers and student teachers with different background. The results suggested that high school physical education preservice teachers placed high priority on SR while high school student teachers placed high priority on DM and LP. It implied that high school physical education preservice teachers focused on student learning in cooperation and team spirit while high school physical education student teachers emphasized on student learning in motor skill. Key words: physical education, preservice teacher, student teacher, value orientation
author2 Keh Nyit Chin
author_facet Keh Nyit Chin
Wang Shiu-mei
王秀梅
author Wang Shiu-mei
王秀梅
spellingShingle Wang Shiu-mei
王秀梅
Comparison of high school physical education preservice teacher''s and student teacher''s value orientation
author_sort Wang Shiu-mei
title Comparison of high school physical education preservice teacher''s and student teacher''s value orientation
title_short Comparison of high school physical education preservice teacher''s and student teacher''s value orientation
title_full Comparison of high school physical education preservice teacher''s and student teacher''s value orientation
title_fullStr Comparison of high school physical education preservice teacher''s and student teacher''s value orientation
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of high school physical education preservice teacher''s and student teacher''s value orientation
title_sort comparison of high school physical education preservice teacher''s and student teacher''s value orientation
publishDate 2002
url http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/42315628361888130856
work_keys_str_mv AT wangshiumei comparisonofhighschoolphysicaleducationpreserviceteachersandstudentteachersvalueorientation
AT wángxiùméi comparisonofhighschoolphysicaleducationpreserviceteachersandstudentteachersvalueorientation
AT wangshiumei zhōngxuézhíqiányǔshíxítǐyùjiàoshīkèchéngjiàzhíqǔxiàngbǐjiàozhīyánjiū
AT wángxiùméi zhōngxuézhíqiányǔshíxítǐyùjiàoshīkèchéngjiàzhíqǔxiàngbǐjiàozhīyánjiū
_version_ 1716829676073123840