公共工程統包採購制度執行最有利標選商評選項目之研究
碩士 === 國立臺灣大學 === 土木工程學研究所 === 90 === Project delivery method is the most important step to perform the projects of public works with high quality and efficiency. Design-build that integrated at least design and construction has been popularly used abroad due to its great benefit. In Taiwan, design-...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Others |
Language: | zh-TW |
Published: |
2002
|
Online Access: | http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/24906237883113473681 |
id |
ndltd-TW-090NTU00015140 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-TW-090NTU000151402015-10-13T14:38:04Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/24906237883113473681 公共工程統包採購制度執行最有利標選商評選項目之研究 陳淑君 碩士 國立臺灣大學 土木工程學研究所 90 Project delivery method is the most important step to perform the projects of public works with high quality and efficiency. Design-build that integrated at least design and construction has been popularly used abroad due to its great benefit. In Taiwan, design-build is still in the initial stage, there are many issues needed to be discussed about the work flow and design-builder selection. With an eye to the fair selection process is an essential factor which influences project, using the Most Advantageous Tender is a common view to select qualified contractors. It is just the most important to reach the purpose of the government purchase that establishing clearly identified criteria and weight. But there is still no specific framework about evaluation criteria could be adopted by government organization. Otherwise, the way to establish in domestic procurement is referred to similar cases, but its validity is unreliable and even may leave out key factors. It is not easy to build up complete criteria efficiently if undertakers do not have enough professional knowledge and experience. In this research, the main topic is to establish evaluation criteria for design-builder selection and stands for helping government procurement divisions. First, this research integrates major factors with references reviewing, interviews of experts and cases study. Then it uses two phase questionnaires and exact statistical data analysis to quantify individual opinion of each item which they cared objectively. This research drafts a general hierarchy of evaluation criteria for design-builder selection, discusses the correlation between items and analyses the principles of choice. The major purpose is to provide the suggestions of selecting criteria when processing the Most Advantageous Tender in Design-Build. It could estimate the ability of design-builder more completely, increase efficiency and accuracy, and also communicate with committee clearly. In sum, this research hopes to not only reach the goal of finding out the most suitable design-builder but also advance the quality and efficiency of public works. 曾惠斌 陳振川 2002 學位論文 ; thesis 134 zh-TW |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
zh-TW |
format |
Others
|
sources |
NDLTD |
description |
碩士 === 國立臺灣大學 === 土木工程學研究所 === 90 === Project delivery method is the most important step to perform the projects of public works with high quality and efficiency. Design-build that integrated at least design and construction has been popularly used abroad due to its great benefit. In Taiwan, design-build is still in the initial stage, there are many issues needed to be discussed about the work flow and design-builder selection. With an eye to the fair selection process is an essential factor which influences project, using the Most Advantageous Tender is a common view to select qualified contractors. It is just the most important to reach the purpose of the government purchase that establishing clearly identified criteria and weight. But there is still no specific framework about evaluation criteria could be adopted by government organization. Otherwise, the way to establish in domestic procurement is referred to similar cases, but its validity is unreliable and even may leave out key factors. It is not easy to build up complete criteria efficiently if undertakers do not have enough professional knowledge and experience.
In this research, the main topic is to establish evaluation criteria for design-builder selection and stands for helping government procurement divisions. First, this research integrates major factors with references reviewing, interviews of experts and cases study. Then it uses two phase questionnaires and exact statistical data analysis to quantify individual opinion of each item which they cared objectively. This research drafts a general hierarchy of evaluation criteria for design-builder selection, discusses the correlation between items and analyses the principles of choice. The major purpose is to provide the suggestions of selecting criteria when processing the Most Advantageous Tender in Design-Build. It could estimate the ability of design-builder more completely, increase efficiency and accuracy, and also communicate with committee clearly. In sum, this research hopes to not only reach the goal of finding out the most suitable design-builder but also advance the quality and efficiency of public works.
|
author2 |
曾惠斌 |
author_facet |
曾惠斌 陳淑君 |
author |
陳淑君 |
spellingShingle |
陳淑君 公共工程統包採購制度執行最有利標選商評選項目之研究 |
author_sort |
陳淑君 |
title |
公共工程統包採購制度執行最有利標選商評選項目之研究 |
title_short |
公共工程統包採購制度執行最有利標選商評選項目之研究 |
title_full |
公共工程統包採購制度執行最有利標選商評選項目之研究 |
title_fullStr |
公共工程統包採購制度執行最有利標選商評選項目之研究 |
title_full_unstemmed |
公共工程統包採購制度執行最有利標選商評選項目之研究 |
title_sort |
公共工程統包採購制度執行最有利標選商評選項目之研究 |
publishDate |
2002 |
url |
http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/24906237883113473681 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT chénshūjūn gōnggònggōngchéngtǒngbāocǎigòuzhìdùzhíxíngzuìyǒulìbiāoxuǎnshāngpíngxuǎnxiàngmùzhīyánjiū |
_version_ |
1717754911907643392 |