| Summary: | 碩士 === 淡江大學 === 中國文學系 === 90 === The focus of this thesis is the analysis and review of Wey Gong Tzyy throughout the different stages of history. The ground of these analysis are based on the review and critics of Gwo Tzyy, Tzs Ma Chien, and Ban Goo. In this thesis, we view how the stature and thinking of Way Gong Tzyy is judged and applied in history. We also look into the progression of such research and evaluate the different perspectives though time.With the above motive in mind, we target the time period of our research from the end of the Epoch of Warring States to the beginning of the Han Dynasty. The author gathers the critics of Way Gong Tzyy from all fields of resources, and individually outlines their reason and influence in history. In addition, the author also reveals the similarities and changes of the above critics from end of the Epoch of Warring States to the beginning of the Han Dynasty. In accordance with the above topic, the following is the outline of the thesis: Section 1) Introduction to the motive of the thesis and its progression. Section 2) The analysis of Dai Fu Guo Tzs of Tsi Dynasty, Guo Tzyy, and the author of “Epic of Warring States” during the Epoch of Warring States. Section 3) The research and study amiss the Chyn and Han Dynasty to the Han Wu Dee Dynasty. The subjects include the descendent of the Chyn and Han Dynasty, Chang Eel, Chen Tse, and Lao Ban. Also, the descendents of Han Wen Dee Dynasty, descendents of Han Ging Dee, Mai Chan, descendents of Han Wu Dee Dynasty, Don Fan Suo, Wai nationalities and Tse Ma Chien. Section 4) The periodical analysis from the end of Tsi Dynasty to the beginning of Dong Han Dynasty. The subjects include descendents of Tsi Dynasty, Lao Tien, Hu Wu, Han Ling, etc. Section 5) Conclusion.
In conclusion, we can observe how abstract and uncertain the review of one historical figure can be when taking all perspective into light. This is due to the different author, reader, circumstance, and historical time frame in the reviews. We can also see how historical figures are judged and how historical recordings are affected by these factors. Most of all, we discover the spirit behind the preference of historical recorders, and their judgment with their own perspective in mind.
|
|---|
