Applying Technical Indicators: An Empirical Test of the Taiwan Government Bond Yield

碩士 === 輔仁大學 === 金融研究所 === 91 === Applying Technical Indicators: An Empirical Test of the Taiwan Government Bond Yield KEYWORDS: technical indicators, government bond yield, KD, RSI, BIAS ABSTRACT: The study applies technical indicators that are frequently...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jim Huang, 黃俊榮
Other Authors: 李宗培
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 2003
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/71027632656992059704
id ndltd-TW-091FJU00214027
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-TW-091FJU002140272015-10-13T17:01:21Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/71027632656992059704 Applying Technical Indicators: An Empirical Test of the Taiwan Government Bond Yield 技術分析交易策略應用於台灣公債市場之模擬研究 Jim Huang 黃俊榮 碩士 輔仁大學 金融研究所 91 Applying Technical Indicators: An Empirical Test of the Taiwan Government Bond Yield KEYWORDS: technical indicators, government bond yield, KD, RSI, BIAS ABSTRACT: The study applies technical indicators that are frequently monitored by the participants of the Taiwan government bond market to the Taiwan government bond yield data to see if technical analysis would generate excess returns. The yield data is converted to the price data, and the returns are calculated based on the price data. The entire period of available data is divided into sub-periods of 22 trading days per period. The first part of the study compares the performance of the active trading strategy based on technical indicators to that of the buy-and-hold strategy for all sub-periods. While the number of sub-periods in which the buy-and-hold strategy outperforms is greater in the bull market, the number of sub-periods in which the active trading strategy outperforms is greater in the bear market. The technical indicators seem to correctly generate sell signals so that the number of sub-periods that the active trading strategy outperforms the buy-and-hold strategy in the bear market is substantially greater. In a leveling market, neither strategy prevails. In the second part of the study, an average return is calculated for each of all sub-periods, and statistical tests are applied to these average returns. The statistical tests conclude that all technical indicators are not significant. The average return for the entire period of the active trading strategy is greater than that of the buy-and-hold strategy. However, the profits of the active trading strategy are mainly generated through selling in the bear market, and the active trading strategy does not outperform the buy-and-hold strategy in the bull market. Therefore, the study concludes that the active trading strategy based on technical analysis does not outperform a simple buy-and-hold strategy. 李宗培 2003 學位論文 ; thesis 58 zh-TW
collection NDLTD
language zh-TW
format Others
sources NDLTD
description 碩士 === 輔仁大學 === 金融研究所 === 91 === Applying Technical Indicators: An Empirical Test of the Taiwan Government Bond Yield KEYWORDS: technical indicators, government bond yield, KD, RSI, BIAS ABSTRACT: The study applies technical indicators that are frequently monitored by the participants of the Taiwan government bond market to the Taiwan government bond yield data to see if technical analysis would generate excess returns. The yield data is converted to the price data, and the returns are calculated based on the price data. The entire period of available data is divided into sub-periods of 22 trading days per period. The first part of the study compares the performance of the active trading strategy based on technical indicators to that of the buy-and-hold strategy for all sub-periods. While the number of sub-periods in which the buy-and-hold strategy outperforms is greater in the bull market, the number of sub-periods in which the active trading strategy outperforms is greater in the bear market. The technical indicators seem to correctly generate sell signals so that the number of sub-periods that the active trading strategy outperforms the buy-and-hold strategy in the bear market is substantially greater. In a leveling market, neither strategy prevails. In the second part of the study, an average return is calculated for each of all sub-periods, and statistical tests are applied to these average returns. The statistical tests conclude that all technical indicators are not significant. The average return for the entire period of the active trading strategy is greater than that of the buy-and-hold strategy. However, the profits of the active trading strategy are mainly generated through selling in the bear market, and the active trading strategy does not outperform the buy-and-hold strategy in the bull market. Therefore, the study concludes that the active trading strategy based on technical analysis does not outperform a simple buy-and-hold strategy.
author2 李宗培
author_facet 李宗培
Jim Huang
黃俊榮
author Jim Huang
黃俊榮
spellingShingle Jim Huang
黃俊榮
Applying Technical Indicators: An Empirical Test of the Taiwan Government Bond Yield
author_sort Jim Huang
title Applying Technical Indicators: An Empirical Test of the Taiwan Government Bond Yield
title_short Applying Technical Indicators: An Empirical Test of the Taiwan Government Bond Yield
title_full Applying Technical Indicators: An Empirical Test of the Taiwan Government Bond Yield
title_fullStr Applying Technical Indicators: An Empirical Test of the Taiwan Government Bond Yield
title_full_unstemmed Applying Technical Indicators: An Empirical Test of the Taiwan Government Bond Yield
title_sort applying technical indicators: an empirical test of the taiwan government bond yield
publishDate 2003
url http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/71027632656992059704
work_keys_str_mv AT jimhuang applyingtechnicalindicatorsanempiricaltestofthetaiwangovernmentbondyield
AT huángjùnróng applyingtechnicalindicatorsanempiricaltestofthetaiwangovernmentbondyield
AT jimhuang jìshùfēnxījiāoyìcèlüèyīngyòngyútáiwāngōngzhàishìchǎngzhīmónǐyánjiū
AT huángjùnróng jìshùfēnxījiāoyìcèlüèyīngyòngyútáiwāngōngzhàishìchǎngzhīmónǐyánjiū
_version_ 1717778154005725184