| Summary: | 博士 === 國立彰化師範大學 === 工業教育學系 === 91 === Abstract
The purpose of this research was discussing the constructions of school effectiveness indicators and weight of vocational senior high schools in our country, and the school effectiveness indicator cognition of vocational senior high school teachers would also be studied as the reference for the school evaluation and operational management of vocational senior high schools. The whole procedure could be divided into three stages. First, to build the available indicators of vocational senior high schools by the Delphi Method; second, to use AHP Method to assess the weight of indicators ; at last to discuss the school effectiveness indicator cognition. The study samples included 17 people of the professional group of Delphi, 76 people of the indicator weight construction, and 885 people of the questionnaire of school effectiveness indicator cognition investigation of vocational senior high schools., and here came the conclusion up:
A. There were 4 levels of school effectiveness indicators and weight-level construction of this research. The first-level indicator included three aspects, which were " educational input" weight 23.0%； “educational process" weight 44.7%； and "educational output" weight 32.3%. The second-level indicator included nine aspects, which were school development program, weight 8.0%, school resource application weight 7.5%; quality of faculty weight 17.8%; school administrative management, weight 7.2%; instructional quality, weight 16.1%; school organizational climate, weight 10.7%; student''''s learning performance, weight 17.4%; reputation of school and community, weight 5.4%; and satisfaction of faculty, weight 9.9%. There were also 2 or 3 third-level indicators of the second-level one, and there were totally 25 third-level indicators, which could be re-divided into 75 indicatory items.
B. The faculties of vocational senior high schools had the same cognitive state greatly of school effectiveness indicators and there was no significant difference of each background variance that meant all the faculties of vocational senior high schools had an agreement of the school effectiveness indicators, which were made by this study.
|
|---|
