花蓮地區青少年休閒活動現況與休閒阻礙因素之研究

• Main Author: 胡信吉
• Other Authors: 鄭志富
• Format: Others
• Language: zh-TW
• Published: 2003
• Online Access: http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/72941540212935994518

碩士 === 國立臺灣師範大學 === 體育學系在職進修碩士班 === 91 === A Study of Status quo and Barriers for the Teenagers’ Participating in Recreation in Hualien Area Master Thesis, 2003 Hsin-chi Hu Advisor: Chih-fu Cheng. Ed. D. ABSTRACT The major purpose of this research lay in the factors resulting in the status quo and barriers of the teenagers’ participating in recreation in Hualien area. Furthermore, the difference between the factors with different backgrounds and participation and barriers in recreation was also under investigation. Questionnaires survey was the way for material gathering of this research; the teenage students in Hualien area were the main targets, and the samples were chosen according to the cluster sampling, 16 schools picked from 38 junior and (vocational) senior high schools with the return of 1064 valid questionnaires. Those valid questionnaires were analyzed in the statistical methods, description statistics, t - test, one-way ANOVA. The results were as following: 1. The situation of the participation in leisure activities: (1) The top ten leisure activities which teenagers’ in Hualien area really participate in were: watching TV, listening to music, chatting, riding bikes, playing video game, playing sports, surfing the net (material searching), shopping, reading comic books and reading the newspapers and magazines. (2) The categories of the leisure activities were: “entertainment”, “social service”, “knowledge”, “physics”, and “art”. 2. The factors of leisure barriers: (1) The top five leisure barriers affecting the participation of Hualien teenagers’ in leisure activities were: time, schoolwork pressure, weather, attitude of family, and the distance from the spot. (2) According to the intensity, the factors of leisure barriers in the participation of the teenagers’ in leisure activities were categorized as following: “schoolwork factor”, “external factor”, “instructors factor”, “personal factor”, and “recreational resources”. 3. The comparison of divergence in the factors of difference backgrounds and leisure activities participation: (1) The categories of the leisure activities participation: for the teenagers’ in Hualien area, there was obvious divergence in the categories of the leisure activities participation and the different background factors, such as sex, educational degree, districts, tribes, and recreational fees. (2) The frequency of the leisure activities participation: for the teenagers’ in Hualien area, there was obvious divergence in the frequency of the leisure activities participation and the different background factors (educational degree, districts, tribes, and recreational fees). 4. The comparison of divergence in the factors of difference backgrounds and the factors of leisure barriers: (1) The categories of leisure barriers: for the teenagers’ in Hualien area, there was obvious divergence in the categories of leisure barriers and the different background factors, such as sex, educational degree, districts, tribes, and recreational fees. (2) The degree of the barriers in leisure activities: for the teenagers’ in Hualien area, there was obvious divergence in the degree of the barriers in leisure activities and the different background factors (sex, educational degree, and tribes). Key words: recreation, leisure activity, frequency of recreation participating, leisure barrier factor