| Summary: | 碩士 === 臺東師範學院 === 教育研究所 === 91 === Ethnicity on campus is by definition all personal interactions on campus including interactions between principal and teacher, teacher and teacher, teacher and student, teacher and parents, student and student; when these interactions are well-balanced, campus will be able to make progress in a peace environment, otherwise school matters will hardly be done.
With social change and family function failure, school takes responsibilities solely, teachers are getting more burdened tasks, but there is a trace of the decline of ethnicity on campus. This research takes a grade school principal, director, and teacher in different areas in Taitung County as subjects and conducts interviews in the purpose of getting insights of current ethnicity on campus, why it declines, and the future of ethnicity on campus.
The research collects data by means of literature review, interviews in person, and interviews by phone. In terms of literature review, each factor has an influence over ethnicity on campus will be reviewed, categorized into seven interview topics, and each topic further develops into three minor questions for more insightful discussion.
The results show that ethnicity on campus is downplayed, however, it is a crucial element that keeps ethnic order on campus well established. In particular, when moral subject is removed from the new program, student’s morality and behavior are badly affected. Moreover, the principal appointment system is highly in need of improvement, media education needs to be practiced in time, and so on. Based on these results, researcher has brought up appropriate suggestions.
In the end, conclusions and suggestions are as follows:
1. School administrators (including the principal) with final authorization shall participate democratically by communicating beforehand to remove obstacles and have school function more efficiently.
2. Teachers shall show respects to seniors and directors in terms of attitudes in order to set role models of manners and keep campus in harmony.
3. Parents and teachers are aught to have enough contact allowing family education and school education work together.
4. Teachers shall fulfill “educational passion” in order to act professionally; therefore, this standard should be included in teacher’s evaluation.
5. Moral subject shall be treated as a single subject for the development of value judgment and independent thinking.
6. Take advantage of team teaching to establish learning organization, learning and growing together.
7. The appointment and evaluation of principal shall consider his/her educational performance mostly for this is his/her most important mission. The perspective can both consider student’s educational right and state’s educational goals.
|
|---|
