Performance Persistency of Equity Holding-Ratio by Institutional Investors in the Taiwan Stock Market

碩士 === 銘傳大學 === 財務金融學系碩士在職專班 === 92 === This paper evaluates the potential effects of institution-trading on stocks price using the trading data fully quoted on the Taiwan Securities Exchange Company (TSEC) from 1993 to 2004.We shows that price-persisting of stocks refers to their holding-ratio by t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chi-Hua Chen, 陳啟華
Other Authors: 作者未提供
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 2004
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/87h796
Description
Summary:碩士 === 銘傳大學 === 財務金融學系碩士在職專班 === 92 === This paper evaluates the potential effects of institution-trading on stocks price using the trading data fully quoted on the Taiwan Securities Exchange Company (TSEC) from 1993 to 2004.We shows that price-persisting of stocks refers to their holding-ratio by three institutions. The performance of stocks with top 10% holding-ratio by institutions will still stay among top-performing groups in the next periods. We suggest that holding-ratio by institutions serve as another indicator in addition to past performance in momentum life cycle model (Lee and Swaminathan,2000). With MLC model, the feasible strategies are formed as follows: buying past winner with high holding-ratio by institutions and selling past loser with low holding-ratio by institutions at the early-stage (defined as ?type); buying past winner with low holding-ratio by institutions and selling past loser with high holding-ratio by institutions at the later-stage (defined as β-type). The empirical evidence shows that simple momentum strategy is not necessarily profitable less than one year; however, the high holding-ratio winner outperforms the simple momentum strategy. Holding-ratio by institutions and past performance is helpful to determine future performance of the stock-investing portfolio. For intermediate and short period, the high holding-ratio portfolio outperforms low holding-ratio one. The main results are as follows: the ?type momentum strategy profits most regardless of time-span. Either ?type or β-type momentum strategy outperforms simple price-momentum strategy in short and intermediate term; however, the results will reverse in longer than one year.