The Research of Establish Evaluating and Selecting Index for Ministry of National Defense Major Weapon Systems Based on the Balanced Scorecard Perspective

碩士 === 國防管理學院 === 後勤管理研究所 === 92 === National security is priceless and the establishment of national forces consumes extreme expense of cost. The assessment and choice decision of major weapon equipment system is one grave national defense topic. Therefore it is necessary and essential that, by mea...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jue-Hsin Sun, 孫覺新
Other Authors: 朱艷芳 博 士
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 2004
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/99291811909340936182
id ndltd-TW-092NDMC1715015
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-TW-092NDMC17150152016-06-17T04:16:19Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/99291811909340936182 The Research of Establish Evaluating and Selecting Index for Ministry of National Defense Major Weapon Systems Based on the Balanced Scorecard Perspective 植基於平衡計分卡建構國軍主要武器系統 Jue-Hsin Sun 孫覺新 碩士 國防管理學院 後勤管理研究所 92 National security is priceless and the establishment of national forces consumes extreme expense of cost. The assessment and choice decision of major weapon equipment system is one grave national defense topic. Therefore it is necessary and essential that, by means of scientific analyses of tools and methods, a just, objective and transparent policy making mechanism of assessment must be set up. The study is thus oriented, based on the methodical foundation of BSC to evaluate the four important perspective dimensions of financing, customer, internal process management and learning & growth. Being in accordance with documentation research, the current status of ROC national forces weapon system analyses and interview outcomes with experts in this field; the basic researching methods are determined as: main perspective dimensions for assessment and their corresponding evaluation indicators, interviews or questionnaires of experts by means of Delphi Law reconfirming the integrity and importance of assessment perspective dimension for major weapon system suppliers, and the evaluation indicators mentioned in this research. AHP stratification analytic dual comparison of various level assessment perspective dimensions and the evaluation indicators by Expert Choice software After AHP stratification analytic dual comparison, “customer perspective” of the four perspective dimensions is the most important item, followed by “financing perspective”, “internal process management” and “learning & growth”. The last two are reconfirmed as this research planned before. The result of the questionnaires also shows that, in order to choose the best weapon system supplier for the weapon system to meet operation requirement, most of experts interviewed think that financial cost can be considered with more flexibility while the price is not always the major stable factor in the assessment 朱艷芳 博 士 陳珠龍 博 士 2004 學位論文 ; thesis 118 zh-TW
collection NDLTD
language zh-TW
format Others
sources NDLTD
description 碩士 === 國防管理學院 === 後勤管理研究所 === 92 === National security is priceless and the establishment of national forces consumes extreme expense of cost. The assessment and choice decision of major weapon equipment system is one grave national defense topic. Therefore it is necessary and essential that, by means of scientific analyses of tools and methods, a just, objective and transparent policy making mechanism of assessment must be set up. The study is thus oriented, based on the methodical foundation of BSC to evaluate the four important perspective dimensions of financing, customer, internal process management and learning & growth. Being in accordance with documentation research, the current status of ROC national forces weapon system analyses and interview outcomes with experts in this field; the basic researching methods are determined as: main perspective dimensions for assessment and their corresponding evaluation indicators, interviews or questionnaires of experts by means of Delphi Law reconfirming the integrity and importance of assessment perspective dimension for major weapon system suppliers, and the evaluation indicators mentioned in this research. AHP stratification analytic dual comparison of various level assessment perspective dimensions and the evaluation indicators by Expert Choice software After AHP stratification analytic dual comparison, “customer perspective” of the four perspective dimensions is the most important item, followed by “financing perspective”, “internal process management” and “learning & growth”. The last two are reconfirmed as this research planned before. The result of the questionnaires also shows that, in order to choose the best weapon system supplier for the weapon system to meet operation requirement, most of experts interviewed think that financial cost can be considered with more flexibility while the price is not always the major stable factor in the assessment
author2 朱艷芳 博 士
author_facet 朱艷芳 博 士
Jue-Hsin Sun
孫覺新
author Jue-Hsin Sun
孫覺新
spellingShingle Jue-Hsin Sun
孫覺新
The Research of Establish Evaluating and Selecting Index for Ministry of National Defense Major Weapon Systems Based on the Balanced Scorecard Perspective
author_sort Jue-Hsin Sun
title The Research of Establish Evaluating and Selecting Index for Ministry of National Defense Major Weapon Systems Based on the Balanced Scorecard Perspective
title_short The Research of Establish Evaluating and Selecting Index for Ministry of National Defense Major Weapon Systems Based on the Balanced Scorecard Perspective
title_full The Research of Establish Evaluating and Selecting Index for Ministry of National Defense Major Weapon Systems Based on the Balanced Scorecard Perspective
title_fullStr The Research of Establish Evaluating and Selecting Index for Ministry of National Defense Major Weapon Systems Based on the Balanced Scorecard Perspective
title_full_unstemmed The Research of Establish Evaluating and Selecting Index for Ministry of National Defense Major Weapon Systems Based on the Balanced Scorecard Perspective
title_sort research of establish evaluating and selecting index for ministry of national defense major weapon systems based on the balanced scorecard perspective
publishDate 2004
url http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/99291811909340936182
work_keys_str_mv AT juehsinsun theresearchofestablishevaluatingandselectingindexforministryofnationaldefensemajorweaponsystemsbasedonthebalancedscorecardperspective
AT sūnjuéxīn theresearchofestablishevaluatingandselectingindexforministryofnationaldefensemajorweaponsystemsbasedonthebalancedscorecardperspective
AT juehsinsun zhíjīyúpínghéngjìfēnkǎjiàngòuguójūnzhǔyàowǔqìxìtǒng
AT sūnjuéxīn zhíjīyúpínghéngjìfēnkǎjiàngòuguójūnzhǔyàowǔqìxìtǒng
AT juehsinsun researchofestablishevaluatingandselectingindexforministryofnationaldefensemajorweaponsystemsbasedonthebalancedscorecardperspective
AT sūnjuéxīn researchofestablishevaluatingandselectingindexforministryofnationaldefensemajorweaponsystemsbasedonthebalancedscorecardperspective
_version_ 1718307580585967616