Optimal Asset Allocation with Downside Risk Constraints

碩士 === 國立高雄第一科技大學 === 風險管理與保險所 === 92 === One of the most important aspects in asset allocation problems is the assumed probability distribution of future returns. In most theoretical and empirical works , a normal or lognormal distribution is usually assumed. Financial managers generally suppose no...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: I-Kai Zau, 卓逸愷
Other Authors: En-Der Su
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 2004
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/08146575176450696587
id ndltd-TW-092NKIT5218024
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-TW-092NKIT52180242015-10-13T13:23:55Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/08146575176450696587 Optimal Asset Allocation with Downside Risk Constraints 下方風險限制下之最適資產配置 I-Kai Zau 卓逸愷 碩士 國立高雄第一科技大學 風險管理與保險所 92 One of the most important aspects in asset allocation problems is the assumed probability distribution of future returns. In most theoretical and empirical works , a normal or lognormal distribution is usually assumed. Financial managers generally suppose normal distribution, even if extreme realizations usually have an higher frequency than results in the case of normally distributed returns. One of the main characteristics of the normal distribution is that its tail decays exponentially toward zero; thus extreme realizations are very unlikely. However, this seems to contradict empirical findings on asset return, which state that these returns generally exhibit leptokurtic behaviour, i.e., have fatter tails than normal distribution. In particular, in the optimization problem, we assume that returns are generated by a multivariate Student-t, when in reality returns come from a multivariate distribution where each marginal is a Student-t with different degrees of freedom. As is known from the safety first principle, the shortfall constraint reflects the investor typical desire to limit downside risk by putting a (probabilistic) upper bound on the maximum loss. Results obtained reveal that the optimal asset mixes involve less of the relatively safe cash and more of the risky assets, stocks and bonds, i.e., if the required shortfall return is lower, the effect is more pronounced. Our results also show that the shortfall probability set by the financial manager plays a crucial role for the nature of the effect of leptokurtic asset returns. If the shortfall probability is set sufficiently high, using larger freedom degree of student-t for the leptokurtic asset return leads to overly prudent and therefore inefficient asset allocations. If the shortfall probability is sufficiently small, however, the use of larger freedom degree leads to unfeasible strategies if reality is fat-tailed. En-Der Su 蘇恩德 2004 學位論文 ; thesis 55 zh-TW
collection NDLTD
language zh-TW
format Others
sources NDLTD
description 碩士 === 國立高雄第一科技大學 === 風險管理與保險所 === 92 === One of the most important aspects in asset allocation problems is the assumed probability distribution of future returns. In most theoretical and empirical works , a normal or lognormal distribution is usually assumed. Financial managers generally suppose normal distribution, even if extreme realizations usually have an higher frequency than results in the case of normally distributed returns. One of the main characteristics of the normal distribution is that its tail decays exponentially toward zero; thus extreme realizations are very unlikely. However, this seems to contradict empirical findings on asset return, which state that these returns generally exhibit leptokurtic behaviour, i.e., have fatter tails than normal distribution. In particular, in the optimization problem, we assume that returns are generated by a multivariate Student-t, when in reality returns come from a multivariate distribution where each marginal is a Student-t with different degrees of freedom. As is known from the safety first principle, the shortfall constraint reflects the investor typical desire to limit downside risk by putting a (probabilistic) upper bound on the maximum loss. Results obtained reveal that the optimal asset mixes involve less of the relatively safe cash and more of the risky assets, stocks and bonds, i.e., if the required shortfall return is lower, the effect is more pronounced. Our results also show that the shortfall probability set by the financial manager plays a crucial role for the nature of the effect of leptokurtic asset returns. If the shortfall probability is set sufficiently high, using larger freedom degree of student-t for the leptokurtic asset return leads to overly prudent and therefore inefficient asset allocations. If the shortfall probability is sufficiently small, however, the use of larger freedom degree leads to unfeasible strategies if reality is fat-tailed.
author2 En-Der Su
author_facet En-Der Su
I-Kai Zau
卓逸愷
author I-Kai Zau
卓逸愷
spellingShingle I-Kai Zau
卓逸愷
Optimal Asset Allocation with Downside Risk Constraints
author_sort I-Kai Zau
title Optimal Asset Allocation with Downside Risk Constraints
title_short Optimal Asset Allocation with Downside Risk Constraints
title_full Optimal Asset Allocation with Downside Risk Constraints
title_fullStr Optimal Asset Allocation with Downside Risk Constraints
title_full_unstemmed Optimal Asset Allocation with Downside Risk Constraints
title_sort optimal asset allocation with downside risk constraints
publishDate 2004
url http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/08146575176450696587
work_keys_str_mv AT ikaizau optimalassetallocationwithdownsideriskconstraints
AT zhuōyìkǎi optimalassetallocationwithdownsideriskconstraints
AT ikaizau xiàfāngfēngxiǎnxiànzhìxiàzhīzuìshìzīchǎnpèizhì
AT zhuōyìkǎi xiàfāngfēngxiǎnxiànzhìxiàzhīzuìshìzīchǎnpèizhì
_version_ 1717733842404507648