| Summary: | 碩士 === 華梵大學 === 東方人文思想研究所 === 93 === Abstract
Hu Hung（alias Wu Feng）initiated Hunan school of thought during the turmoil of war in the Southern Sung Dynasty, and it enjoys a glittering status in Confucianism, inheriting Confucianism in Northern Sung Dynasty and followed by Confucianism in Ming Dynasty. Besides his heritage, Wu Feng’s philosophy has its characteristics, which are cognitive, interpretative, and introspective and remain their original meaning. There requires an interpretation approach. However, comprehensive interpretation even needs to build up a philosophical system, and then the definition of my interpretation approach is that: “Becoming a sage on the very daily affairs”, which is also referred to as “manifesting substance on the very function ”. Interpretation approach has also given justification of Zhu Xi’s “doubt about knowledge of speeches”, “principle of nature” in the academic circle and metaphysical approach in the contemporary neo-Confucianism. For constructing Wu Feng’s philosophic system, four kinds of argument have been constructed, namely “ ontology, cosmology, practice theory, and state-of-mind theory. Such four kinds of argument have been elaborated one by one. In interpretation and construction, with Wu Feng’s criticism of Tao and Buddha, the heart and core of the Confucius values go to benevolent morality, which are unshakable. Consequently, the philosophy of Wu Feng, that is to say (1) Interpretation approach (2) thinking justification of scholars (3) Theory construction and criticism of Tao and Buddha, whose standpoint of values have made up of three major key points in this paper. The paper concludes that “ Fu Feng’s dedication to educational undertaking in the turmoil of war has been considered as eminent and successful”, and he is acclaimed as an educationist handing down heritage from generation to generation. His Confucius theory is summed up with the special honor of “Becoming a sage on the very daily affairs”. I am with great anticipation that my paper may increase awareness of Wu Feng’s academic status in Chinese Philosophy.
Key words:
Fu Wu-Feng, Confucianism in the Southern Sung Dynasty, knowledge of speeches, Becoming a sage on the very daily affairs, principle of nature, Mou Chung-San, Tsung Shih-Li, concept of substance and function, ontology, cosmology, practice theory, state-of-mind theory
Abstract
Hu Hung（alias Wu Feng）initiated Hunan school of thought during the turmoil of war in the Southern Sung Dynasty, and it enjoys a glittering status in Confucianism, inheriting Confucianism in Northern Sung Dynasty and followed by Confucianism in Ming Dynasty. Besides his heritage, Wu Feng’s philosophy has its characteristics, which are cognitive, interpretative, and introspective and remain their original meaning. There requires an interpretation approach. However, comprehensive interpretation even needs to build up a philosophical system, and then the definition of my interpretation approach is that: “Becoming a sage on the very daily affairs”, which is also referred to as “manifesting substance on the very function ”. Interpretation approach has also given justification of Zhu Xi’s “doubt about knowledge of speeches”, “principle of nature” in the academic circle and metaphysical approach in the contemporary neo-Confucianism. For constructing Wu Feng’s philosophic system, four kinds of argument have been constructed, namely “ ontology, cosmology, practice theory, and state-of-mind theory. Such four kinds of argument have been elaborated one by one. In interpretation and construction, with Wu Feng’s criticism of Tao and Buddha, the heart and core of the Confucius values go to benevolent morality, which are unshakable. Consequently, the philosophy of Wu Feng, that is to say (1) Interpretation approach (2) thinking justification of scholars (3) Theory construction and criticism of Tao and Buddha, whose standpoint of values have made up of three major key points in this paper. The paper concludes that “ Fu Feng’s dedication to educational undertaking in the turmoil of war has been considered as eminent and successful”, and he is acclaimed as an educationist handing down heritage from generation to generation. His Confucius theory is summed up with the special honor of “Becoming a sage on the very daily affairs”. I am with great anticipation that my paper may increase awareness of Wu Feng’s academic status in Chinese Philosophy.
Key words:
Fu Wu-Feng, Confucianism in the Southern Sung Dynasty, knowledge of speeches, Becoming a sage on the very daily affairs, principle of nature, Mou Chung-San, Tsung Shih-Li, concept of substance and function, ontology, cosmology, practice theory, state-of-mind theory
Abstract
Hu Hung（alias Wu Feng）initiated Hunan school of thought during the turmoil of war in the Southern Sung Dynasty, and it enjoys a glittering status in Confucianism, inheriting Confucianism in Northern Sung Dynasty and followed by Confucianism in Ming Dynasty. Besides his heritage, Wu Feng’s philosophy has its characteristics, which are cognitive, interpretative, and introspective and remain their original meaning. There requires an interpretation approach. However, comprehensive interpretation even needs to build up a philosophical system, and then the definition of my interpretation approach is that: “Becoming a sage on the very daily affairs”, which is also referred to as “manifesting substance on the very function ”. Interpretation approach has also given justification of Zhu Xi’s “doubt about knowledge of speeches”, “principle of nature” in the academic circle and metaphysical approach in the contemporary neo-Confucianism. For constructing Wu Feng’s philosophic system, four kinds of argument have been constructed, namely “ ontology, cosmology, practice theory, and state-of-mind theory. Such four kinds of argument have been elaborated one by one. In interpretation and construction, with Wu Feng’s criticism of Tao and Buddha, the heart and core of the Confucius values go to benevolent morality, which are unshakable. Consequently, the philosophy of Wu Feng, that is to say (1) Interpretation approach (2) thinking justification of scholars (3) Theory construction and criticism of Tao and Buddha, whose standpoint of values have made up of three major key points in this paper. The paper concludes that “ Fu Feng’s dedication to educational undertaking in the turmoil of war has been considered as eminent and successful”, and he is acclaimed as an educationist handing down heritage from generation to generation. His Confucius theory is summed up with the special honor of “Becoming a sage on the very daily affairs”. I am with great anticipation that my paper may increase awareness of Wu Feng’s academic status in Chinese Philosophy.
Key words:
Fu Wu-Feng, Confucianism in the Southern Sung Dynasty, knowledge of speeches, Becoming a sage on the very daily affairs, principle of nature, Mou Chung-San, Tsung Shih-Li, concept of substance and function, ontology, cosmology, practice theory, state-of-mind theory
Abstract
Hu Hung（alias Wu Feng）initiated Hunan school of thought during the turmoil of war in the Southern Sung Dynasty, and it enjoys a glittering status in Confucianism, inheriting Confucianism in Northern Sung Dynasty and followed by Confucianism in Ming Dynasty. Besides his heritage, Wu Feng’s philosophy has its characteristics, which are cognitive, interpretative, and introspective and remain their original meaning. There requires an interpretation approach. However, comprehensive interpretation even needs to build up a philosophical system, and then the definition of my interpretation approach is that: “Becoming a sage on the very daily affairs”, which is also referred to as “manifesting substance on the very function ”. Interpretation approach has also given justification of Zhu Xi’s “doubt about knowledge of speeches”, “principle of nature” in the academic circle and metaphysical approach in the contemporary neo-Confucianism. For constructing Wu Feng’s philosophic system, four kinds of argument have been constructed, namely “ ontology, cosmology, practice theory, and state-of-mind theory. Such four kinds of argument have been elaborated one by one. In interpretation and construction, with Wu Feng’s criticism of Tao and Buddha, the heart and core of the Confucius values go to benevolent morality, which are unshakable. Consequently, the philosophy of Wu Feng, that is to say (1) Interpretation approach (2) thinking justification of scholars (3) Theory construction and criticism of Tao and Buddha, whose standpoint of values have made up of three major key points in this paper. The paper concludes that “ Fu Feng’s dedication to educational undertaking in the turmoil of war has been considered as eminent and successful”, and he is acclaimed as an educationist handing down heritage from generation to generation. His Confucius theory is summed up with the special honor of “Becoming a sage on the very daily affairs”. I am with great anticipation that my paper may increase awareness of Wu Feng’s academic status in Chinese Philosophy.
Key words:
Fu Wu-Feng, Confucianism in the Southern Sung Dynasty, knowledge of speeches, Becoming a sage on the very daily affairs, principle of nature, Mou Chung-San, Tsung Shih-Li, concept of substance and function, ontology, cosmology, practice theory, state-of-mind theory
|
|---|
