Prices of Caps and Swaptions under Multi-Factor LIBOR Market Models

碩士 === 國立中央大學 === 財務金融研究所 === 93 === In this paper, we find that for caps, when we assume volatilities are time-homogeneous or flat, 3-factor model is better than 1- and 2-factor model. For swaptions, no matter how many years expiration is, if the tenor is shorter (2 or 3 year), the pricing performa...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shang-Chiun Chen, 陳尚群
Other Authors: Meng-Lan Yueh
Format: Others
Language:en_US
Published: 2005
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/28870951939546801818
id ndltd-TW-093NCU05304006
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-TW-093NCU053040062015-10-13T11:53:34Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/28870951939546801818 Prices of Caps and Swaptions under Multi-Factor LIBOR Market Models 利率上限及交換選擇權之定價-多因子市場利率模型 Shang-Chiun Chen 陳尚群 碩士 國立中央大學 財務金融研究所 93 In this paper, we find that for caps, when we assume volatilities are time-homogeneous or flat, 3-factor model is better than 1- and 2-factor model. For swaptions, no matter how many years expiration is, if the tenor is shorter (2 or 3 year), the pricing performance in the 3-factor mode is better than others. But if the tenor is longer (7 year), the pricing performance of the 3-factor model is not guaranteed to be better than that of other models. If we use time-homogeneous volatilities to evaluate caps or swaptions, pricing performance is very well in most situations. We have to notice this result. Because in the literatures, most of researchers always use parametric instantaneous volatilities (case 3) that are suggested by Rebonato (1998) to evaluate interest rate derivatives. However, we show in this paper that the pricing performance under a parametric instantaneous volatilities assumption might be not very satisfactory. Meng-Lan Yueh 岳夢蘭 2005 學位論文 ; thesis 50 en_US
collection NDLTD
language en_US
format Others
sources NDLTD
description 碩士 === 國立中央大學 === 財務金融研究所 === 93 === In this paper, we find that for caps, when we assume volatilities are time-homogeneous or flat, 3-factor model is better than 1- and 2-factor model. For swaptions, no matter how many years expiration is, if the tenor is shorter (2 or 3 year), the pricing performance in the 3-factor mode is better than others. But if the tenor is longer (7 year), the pricing performance of the 3-factor model is not guaranteed to be better than that of other models. If we use time-homogeneous volatilities to evaluate caps or swaptions, pricing performance is very well in most situations. We have to notice this result. Because in the literatures, most of researchers always use parametric instantaneous volatilities (case 3) that are suggested by Rebonato (1998) to evaluate interest rate derivatives. However, we show in this paper that the pricing performance under a parametric instantaneous volatilities assumption might be not very satisfactory.
author2 Meng-Lan Yueh
author_facet Meng-Lan Yueh
Shang-Chiun Chen
陳尚群
author Shang-Chiun Chen
陳尚群
spellingShingle Shang-Chiun Chen
陳尚群
Prices of Caps and Swaptions under Multi-Factor LIBOR Market Models
author_sort Shang-Chiun Chen
title Prices of Caps and Swaptions under Multi-Factor LIBOR Market Models
title_short Prices of Caps and Swaptions under Multi-Factor LIBOR Market Models
title_full Prices of Caps and Swaptions under Multi-Factor LIBOR Market Models
title_fullStr Prices of Caps and Swaptions under Multi-Factor LIBOR Market Models
title_full_unstemmed Prices of Caps and Swaptions under Multi-Factor LIBOR Market Models
title_sort prices of caps and swaptions under multi-factor libor market models
publishDate 2005
url http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/28870951939546801818
work_keys_str_mv AT shangchiunchen pricesofcapsandswaptionsundermultifactorlibormarketmodels
AT chénshàngqún pricesofcapsandswaptionsundermultifactorlibormarketmodels
AT shangchiunchen lìlǜshàngxiànjíjiāohuànxuǎnzéquánzhīdìngjiàduōyīnzishìchǎnglìlǜmóxíng
AT chénshàngqún lìlǜshàngxiànjíjiāohuànxuǎnzéquánzhīdìngjiàduōyīnzishìchǎnglìlǜmóxíng
_version_ 1716850117829459968