| Summary: | 碩士 === 國立屏東商業技術學院 === 不動產經營系 === 93 === For its importance of the national development, the public infrastructure has already been valued by the international community. It can provide the good quality of life and lighten the government public financial burden. However, since the promotion of private participation in public infrastructure, its development at our country seems to be limited by other factors. Therefore, this research is to examine the problem of our private participation in public infrastructure from its system, its content, and from the comparing to Japanese PFI experience.
By the execution comparison between our country and Japanese PFI, and by the comparison between these two countries’ (Taiwan and Japan) policy and investment cases to the private participation in public infrastructure, the problems following are existed.
1. For the reason that the inducement of investment reward is not enough, the investment wills of civil organizations are not high.
2. The project process of government sections could not be transparent.
3. The local government sections can’t value its importance.
4. The risk on the public and private sections could not be shared effectively.
According to the former problems of the private participation in public infrastructure, this research, after the studying on Japanese executive experience, provides the following solutions:
1. Loosen the measure of investment reward.
2. Make the process of plan transparent.
3. The government sections should push the folks to participate the public infrastructure really.
4. Assign the risks through the VFM idea.
|
|---|
