三種急行跳遠空中動作學習效果比較

碩士 === 國立臺灣師範大學 === 體育學系在職進修碩士班 === 93 === Abstract The purpose of the study was to investigate the learning effects of three different movements in the air of long jump sail, hang and hitch-kick. The participants were the female students of the freshman in Wenzao college. There were a total of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hui Chi Chiang, 江輝祺
Other Authors: Keh Nyit Chin
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 2005
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/59852461637650599123
id ndltd-TW-093NTNU5567036
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-TW-093NTNU55670362016-06-03T04:13:42Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/59852461637650599123 三種急行跳遠空中動作學習效果比較 Hui Chi Chiang 江輝祺 碩士 國立臺灣師範大學 體育學系在職進修碩士班 93 Abstract The purpose of the study was to investigate the learning effects of three different movements in the air of long jump sail, hang and hitch-kick. The participants were the female students of the freshman in Wenzao college. There were a total of 106 students from three different classes learning each movements. Each class was taught by part teaching method through eight classes . The data were analyzed and compared as follows: (1) After compared by t-test correlated samples, the test results of pre-test and post-test of sail (t-value=-1.600) showed no significant difference (p >.05). hang (t-value=-5.630) and hitch-kick (t-value=-8.604) both had significant difference (p <.05). For the pre-test and post-test of skill levels, sail (t-value=-3.437), hang (t-value=-3.564) and hitch-kick (t-value=-9.277) showed significant difference (p <.05). For the pre- and post-test of the learning attitude, sail (t-value=-3.742), hang (t-value=-10.430) and hitch-kick (t-value=-7.900) showed significant difference (p <.05). (2) Through One Way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), F value of three different movements in the air of long jump was 6.470 (p <.05) which reached significant difference. The F value of skill levels was 7.847 (p <.05) and showed significant difference as well. For the learning attitude, the F value was 7.681 (p <.05) and reached significant difference. Through post-hoc-comparison, it was found that the test results of sail and hitch-kick had significant differences. The data showed that hitch-kick was more effective. For the skill levels and learning attitude, all three movements had significant difference. The results showed that hitch-kick and hang demonstreted better learning effects than sail. In short, hitch-kick showed the most significant learning effect. Keh Nyit Chin 闕月清 2005 學位論文 ; thesis 90 zh-TW
collection NDLTD
language zh-TW
format Others
sources NDLTD
description 碩士 === 國立臺灣師範大學 === 體育學系在職進修碩士班 === 93 === Abstract The purpose of the study was to investigate the learning effects of three different movements in the air of long jump sail, hang and hitch-kick. The participants were the female students of the freshman in Wenzao college. There were a total of 106 students from three different classes learning each movements. Each class was taught by part teaching method through eight classes . The data were analyzed and compared as follows: (1) After compared by t-test correlated samples, the test results of pre-test and post-test of sail (t-value=-1.600) showed no significant difference (p >.05). hang (t-value=-5.630) and hitch-kick (t-value=-8.604) both had significant difference (p <.05). For the pre-test and post-test of skill levels, sail (t-value=-3.437), hang (t-value=-3.564) and hitch-kick (t-value=-9.277) showed significant difference (p <.05). For the pre- and post-test of the learning attitude, sail (t-value=-3.742), hang (t-value=-10.430) and hitch-kick (t-value=-7.900) showed significant difference (p <.05). (2) Through One Way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), F value of three different movements in the air of long jump was 6.470 (p <.05) which reached significant difference. The F value of skill levels was 7.847 (p <.05) and showed significant difference as well. For the learning attitude, the F value was 7.681 (p <.05) and reached significant difference. Through post-hoc-comparison, it was found that the test results of sail and hitch-kick had significant differences. The data showed that hitch-kick was more effective. For the skill levels and learning attitude, all three movements had significant difference. The results showed that hitch-kick and hang demonstreted better learning effects than sail. In short, hitch-kick showed the most significant learning effect.
author2 Keh Nyit Chin
author_facet Keh Nyit Chin
Hui Chi Chiang
江輝祺
author Hui Chi Chiang
江輝祺
spellingShingle Hui Chi Chiang
江輝祺
三種急行跳遠空中動作學習效果比較
author_sort Hui Chi Chiang
title 三種急行跳遠空中動作學習效果比較
title_short 三種急行跳遠空中動作學習效果比較
title_full 三種急行跳遠空中動作學習效果比較
title_fullStr 三種急行跳遠空中動作學習效果比較
title_full_unstemmed 三種急行跳遠空中動作學習效果比較
title_sort 三種急行跳遠空中動作學習效果比較
publishDate 2005
url http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/59852461637650599123
work_keys_str_mv AT huichichiang sānzhǒngjíxíngtiàoyuǎnkōngzhōngdòngzuòxuéxíxiàoguǒbǐjiào
AT jiānghuīqí sānzhǒngjíxíngtiàoyuǎnkōngzhōngdòngzuòxuéxíxiàoguǒbǐjiào
_version_ 1718293046818242560