Comparative Semi-Presidencies: Finland, France and R.O.C.

碩士 === 淡江大學 === 歐洲研究所碩士班 === 93 === In 1970, Maurice Duverger defined the word, ‘Semi-presidentialism’ in his book, Institutions politiques et droit constitutionnel. The definition is that the president shall be selected by citizens, own considerable power, and besides the president, there shall be...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jou-Yun Pan, 潘柔澐
Other Authors: Fu-chu Hsieh
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 2005
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/77826883435327142095
id ndltd-TW-093TKU05481019
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-TW-093TKU054810192015-10-13T11:57:26Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/77826883435327142095 Comparative Semi-Presidencies: Finland, France and R.O.C. 半總統制國家之比較:芬蘭,法國與我國 Jou-Yun Pan 潘柔澐 碩士 淡江大學 歐洲研究所碩士班 93 In 1970, Maurice Duverger defined the word, ‘Semi-presidentialism’ in his book, Institutions politiques et droit constitutionnel. The definition is that the president shall be selected by citizens, own considerable power, and besides the president, there shall be a Government with administrative power Cabinet. When the Congress doesn’t trust the Government, it can bring up the resignation of the Cabinet. In 1997, the way of the presidential election in R.O.C. was changed to be selected by citizens, and the president can appoint the premier and ministers of the Cabinet without the agreement of the Congress. The Cabinet shall be responsible for the Congress, and the Congress has the right to bring up the resignation of the cabinet. Obviously, the constitutional system of R.O.C. is conformed to the definitions of Maurice Duverger’s. After the revise of the constitution, the regime of R.O.C. is almost the same as France’s, especially the relationship between the president, the Executive Yuan and the Congress. On the other hand, after examining the practical working of Semi-presidentialism, only a few countries’ politics are found stable, for example, France and Finland. Therefore, the constitutional experiences of France and Finland will be analyzed as the references for the constitutional revise in R.O.C. The interaction of the administration and the legislation of France and Finland will be discussed by taking Institutionalism as the main method, and the regime of R.O.C. will be analyzed and compared to the structures. There are lots of institutional and non-institutional factors including the relationship between the majorities of the Congress and the president, the culture of the constitution, the practical reasons, the culture of politics, the election of the president, the relationship between the president and the political parties, the system of the parties and the historical environment, and they will all be discussed in this research paper. Fu-chu Hsieh 謝福助 2005 學位論文 ; thesis 243 zh-TW
collection NDLTD
language zh-TW
format Others
sources NDLTD
description 碩士 === 淡江大學 === 歐洲研究所碩士班 === 93 === In 1970, Maurice Duverger defined the word, ‘Semi-presidentialism’ in his book, Institutions politiques et droit constitutionnel. The definition is that the president shall be selected by citizens, own considerable power, and besides the president, there shall be a Government with administrative power Cabinet. When the Congress doesn’t trust the Government, it can bring up the resignation of the Cabinet. In 1997, the way of the presidential election in R.O.C. was changed to be selected by citizens, and the president can appoint the premier and ministers of the Cabinet without the agreement of the Congress. The Cabinet shall be responsible for the Congress, and the Congress has the right to bring up the resignation of the cabinet. Obviously, the constitutional system of R.O.C. is conformed to the definitions of Maurice Duverger’s. After the revise of the constitution, the regime of R.O.C. is almost the same as France’s, especially the relationship between the president, the Executive Yuan and the Congress. On the other hand, after examining the practical working of Semi-presidentialism, only a few countries’ politics are found stable, for example, France and Finland. Therefore, the constitutional experiences of France and Finland will be analyzed as the references for the constitutional revise in R.O.C. The interaction of the administration and the legislation of France and Finland will be discussed by taking Institutionalism as the main method, and the regime of R.O.C. will be analyzed and compared to the structures. There are lots of institutional and non-institutional factors including the relationship between the majorities of the Congress and the president, the culture of the constitution, the practical reasons, the culture of politics, the election of the president, the relationship between the president and the political parties, the system of the parties and the historical environment, and they will all be discussed in this research paper.
author2 Fu-chu Hsieh
author_facet Fu-chu Hsieh
Jou-Yun Pan
潘柔澐
author Jou-Yun Pan
潘柔澐
spellingShingle Jou-Yun Pan
潘柔澐
Comparative Semi-Presidencies: Finland, France and R.O.C.
author_sort Jou-Yun Pan
title Comparative Semi-Presidencies: Finland, France and R.O.C.
title_short Comparative Semi-Presidencies: Finland, France and R.O.C.
title_full Comparative Semi-Presidencies: Finland, France and R.O.C.
title_fullStr Comparative Semi-Presidencies: Finland, France and R.O.C.
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Semi-Presidencies: Finland, France and R.O.C.
title_sort comparative semi-presidencies: finland, france and r.o.c.
publishDate 2005
url http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/77826883435327142095
work_keys_str_mv AT jouyunpan comparativesemipresidenciesfinlandfranceandroc
AT pānróuyún comparativesemipresidenciesfinlandfranceandroc
AT jouyunpan bànzǒngtǒngzhìguójiāzhībǐjiàofēnlánfǎguóyǔwǒguó
AT pānróuyún bànzǒngtǒngzhìguójiāzhībǐjiàofēnlánfǎguóyǔwǒguó
_version_ 1716851860465254400