Comparative Semi-Presidencies: Finland, France and R.O.C.
碩士 === 淡江大學 === 歐洲研究所碩士班 === 93 === In 1970, Maurice Duverger defined the word, ‘Semi-presidentialism’ in his book, Institutions politiques et droit constitutionnel. The definition is that the president shall be selected by citizens, own considerable power, and besides the president, there shall be...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Others |
Language: | zh-TW |
Published: |
2005
|
Online Access: | http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/77826883435327142095 |
id |
ndltd-TW-093TKU05481019 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-TW-093TKU054810192015-10-13T11:57:26Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/77826883435327142095 Comparative Semi-Presidencies: Finland, France and R.O.C. 半總統制國家之比較:芬蘭,法國與我國 Jou-Yun Pan 潘柔澐 碩士 淡江大學 歐洲研究所碩士班 93 In 1970, Maurice Duverger defined the word, ‘Semi-presidentialism’ in his book, Institutions politiques et droit constitutionnel. The definition is that the president shall be selected by citizens, own considerable power, and besides the president, there shall be a Government with administrative power Cabinet. When the Congress doesn’t trust the Government, it can bring up the resignation of the Cabinet. In 1997, the way of the presidential election in R.O.C. was changed to be selected by citizens, and the president can appoint the premier and ministers of the Cabinet without the agreement of the Congress. The Cabinet shall be responsible for the Congress, and the Congress has the right to bring up the resignation of the cabinet. Obviously, the constitutional system of R.O.C. is conformed to the definitions of Maurice Duverger’s. After the revise of the constitution, the regime of R.O.C. is almost the same as France’s, especially the relationship between the president, the Executive Yuan and the Congress. On the other hand, after examining the practical working of Semi-presidentialism, only a few countries’ politics are found stable, for example, France and Finland. Therefore, the constitutional experiences of France and Finland will be analyzed as the references for the constitutional revise in R.O.C. The interaction of the administration and the legislation of France and Finland will be discussed by taking Institutionalism as the main method, and the regime of R.O.C. will be analyzed and compared to the structures. There are lots of institutional and non-institutional factors including the relationship between the majorities of the Congress and the president, the culture of the constitution, the practical reasons, the culture of politics, the election of the president, the relationship between the president and the political parties, the system of the parties and the historical environment, and they will all be discussed in this research paper. Fu-chu Hsieh 謝福助 2005 學位論文 ; thesis 243 zh-TW |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
zh-TW |
format |
Others
|
sources |
NDLTD |
description |
碩士 === 淡江大學 === 歐洲研究所碩士班 === 93 === In 1970, Maurice Duverger defined the word, ‘Semi-presidentialism’ in his book, Institutions politiques et droit constitutionnel. The definition is that the president shall be selected by citizens, own considerable power, and besides the president, there shall be a Government with administrative power Cabinet. When the Congress doesn’t trust the Government, it can bring up the resignation of the Cabinet.
In 1997, the way of the presidential election in R.O.C. was changed to be selected by citizens, and the president can appoint the premier and ministers of the Cabinet without the agreement of the Congress. The Cabinet shall be responsible for the Congress, and the Congress has the right to bring up the resignation of the cabinet. Obviously, the constitutional system of R.O.C. is conformed to the definitions of Maurice Duverger’s. After the revise of the constitution, the regime of R.O.C. is almost the same as France’s, especially the relationship between the president, the Executive Yuan and the Congress. On the other hand, after examining the practical working of Semi-presidentialism, only a few countries’ politics are found stable, for example, France and Finland. Therefore, the constitutional experiences of France and Finland will be analyzed as the references for the constitutional revise in R.O.C.
The interaction of the administration and the legislation of France and Finland will be discussed by taking Institutionalism as the main method, and the regime of R.O.C. will be analyzed and compared to the structures. There are lots of institutional and non-institutional factors including the relationship between the majorities of the Congress and the president, the culture of the constitution, the practical reasons, the culture of politics, the election of the president, the relationship between the president and the political parties, the system of the parties and the historical environment, and they will all be discussed in this research paper.
|
author2 |
Fu-chu Hsieh |
author_facet |
Fu-chu Hsieh Jou-Yun Pan 潘柔澐 |
author |
Jou-Yun Pan 潘柔澐 |
spellingShingle |
Jou-Yun Pan 潘柔澐 Comparative Semi-Presidencies: Finland, France and R.O.C. |
author_sort |
Jou-Yun Pan |
title |
Comparative Semi-Presidencies: Finland, France and R.O.C. |
title_short |
Comparative Semi-Presidencies: Finland, France and R.O.C. |
title_full |
Comparative Semi-Presidencies: Finland, France and R.O.C. |
title_fullStr |
Comparative Semi-Presidencies: Finland, France and R.O.C. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparative Semi-Presidencies: Finland, France and R.O.C. |
title_sort |
comparative semi-presidencies: finland, france and r.o.c. |
publishDate |
2005 |
url |
http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/77826883435327142095 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT jouyunpan comparativesemipresidenciesfinlandfranceandroc AT pānróuyún comparativesemipresidenciesfinlandfranceandroc AT jouyunpan bànzǒngtǒngzhìguójiāzhībǐjiàofēnlánfǎguóyǔwǒguó AT pānróuyún bànzǒngtǒngzhìguójiāzhībǐjiàofēnlánfǎguóyǔwǒguó |
_version_ |
1716851860465254400 |