不同創新類型之知識資源建置過程研究
碩士 === 國立政治大學 === 科技管理研究所 === 94 === Peter Drucker refer to knowledge, not compare with manufacturing resource such as labor or capital or land, is the only meaningful resource in new economy system in his writings in 1993.The fundamental economic resource in knowledge based society is not capital o...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Others |
Language: | zh-TW |
Published: |
2005
|
Online Access: | http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/10783280328192642734 |
id |
ndltd-TW-094NCCU5230008 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-TW-094NCCU52300082015-10-13T11:15:48Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/10783280328192642734 不同創新類型之知識資源建置過程研究 Lu,Chun-Yi. 劉俊毅 碩士 國立政治大學 科技管理研究所 94 Peter Drucker refer to knowledge, not compare with manufacturing resource such as labor or capital or land, is the only meaningful resource in new economy system in his writings in 1993.The fundamental economic resource in knowledge based society is not capital or natural resource or labor but knowledge. The enterprise should spend more time to manage knowledge since knowledge is the most important assets. Thus knowledge could bring innovation and create value for enterprise. Therefore, how to create and apply knowledge effectively has become a major issue for business administration(Soo & Park,1999). The knowledge has been regard as a strategic asset gradually. The acquisition, integration, accumulation and diffusion of knowledge is a necessary capability of enterprise to build competitive advantage. Grant refer to knowledge based theory further in 1996.He consider the successful method in dynamic competitive environment is to regard organization capability as a method of knowledge integration and knowledge is the most important strategic resource of organization. The fundamental of all product, visible or invisible, is the accumulation of wisdom. Therefore, the knowledge-based innovation is the critical point of enterprise’s success. This thesis try to discuss what kind of knowledge-diffusion model and knowledge-integration model would easily success in different innovation type from knowledge-based theory. The research methodology is case study of quality method and research target is knowledge intensive industry. The research has interviewed eight managers and concluded four case. Finally, we have some conclusion below : 1. The knowledge of technical innovation is partial to high specificity; the knowledge of managerial innovation is partial to low tacit. 2. The character of knowledge would influence knowledge acquisition and flow model. When character of knowledge is partial to high path dependent, the knowledge acquisition and flow model is partial to develop by enterprise itself;When character of knowledge is partial to low path dependent, the knowledge acquisition and flow model is partial to acquire from outside. 3. The knowledge acquisition and flow model would not influence innovation type obviously. If knowledge acquisition and flow model would influence innovation type obviously, it should match up with organization’s absorptive and integrative mechanism. 4. The innovation type and knowledge character would influence knowledge absorption and integration during innovation process. When innovation type is partial to technical innovation and knowledge character is partial to high tacit and high specificity, then organization’s absorption and integrative mechanism will be partial to adopt all-around methods, include personal knowledge integration, organizational communication and documentlization. When innovation type is partial to managerial innovation and knowledge character is partial to low tacit, then organization’s absorption and integrative mechanism will be partial to adopt one-way method, such as organizational communication. 5. The more complementary assets enterprise have, the easier enterprise to innovate. If enterprise have higher complementary assets, then they could proceed innovation immediately after acquire knowledge. 6. The different types of innovation bring different benefit to enterprise. We find technical innovation(product innovation and process innovation)bring partial benefit to enterprise, and managerial innovation (organizational innovation and strategic innovation)bring all-around benefit to enterprise. Wu,Sehwa. 吳思華 2005 學位論文 ; thesis 121 zh-TW |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
zh-TW |
format |
Others
|
sources |
NDLTD |
description |
碩士 === 國立政治大學 === 科技管理研究所 === 94 === Peter Drucker refer to knowledge, not compare with manufacturing resource such as labor or capital or land, is the only meaningful resource in new economy system in his writings in 1993.The fundamental economic resource in knowledge based society is not capital or natural resource or labor but knowledge. The enterprise should spend more time to manage knowledge since knowledge is the most important assets. Thus knowledge could bring innovation and create value for enterprise. Therefore, how to create and apply knowledge effectively has become a major issue for business administration(Soo & Park,1999). The knowledge has been regard as a strategic asset gradually. The acquisition, integration, accumulation and diffusion of knowledge is a necessary capability of enterprise to build competitive advantage.
Grant refer to knowledge based theory further in 1996.He consider the successful method in dynamic competitive environment is to regard organization capability as a method of knowledge integration and knowledge is the most important strategic resource of organization. The fundamental of all product, visible or invisible, is the accumulation of wisdom. Therefore, the knowledge-based innovation is the critical point of enterprise’s success.
This thesis try to discuss what kind of knowledge-diffusion model and knowledge-integration model would easily success in different innovation type from knowledge-based theory. The research methodology is case study of quality method and research target is knowledge intensive industry. The research has interviewed eight managers and concluded four case. Finally, we have some conclusion below :
1. The knowledge of technical innovation is partial to high specificity; the knowledge of managerial innovation is partial to low tacit.
2. The character of knowledge would influence knowledge acquisition and flow model. When character of knowledge is partial to high path dependent, the knowledge acquisition and flow model is partial to develop by enterprise itself;When character of knowledge is partial to low path dependent, the knowledge acquisition and flow model is partial to acquire from outside.
3. The knowledge acquisition and flow model would not influence innovation type obviously. If knowledge acquisition and flow model would influence innovation type obviously, it should match up with organization’s absorptive and integrative mechanism.
4. The innovation type and knowledge character would influence knowledge absorption and integration during innovation process. When innovation type is partial to technical innovation and knowledge character is partial to high tacit and high specificity, then organization’s absorption and integrative mechanism will be partial to adopt all-around methods, include personal knowledge integration, organizational communication and documentlization. When innovation type is partial to managerial innovation and knowledge character is partial to low tacit, then organization’s absorption and integrative mechanism will be partial to adopt one-way method, such as organizational communication.
5. The more complementary assets enterprise have, the easier enterprise to innovate. If enterprise have higher complementary assets, then they could proceed innovation immediately after acquire knowledge.
6. The different types of innovation bring different benefit to enterprise. We find technical innovation(product innovation and process innovation)bring partial benefit to enterprise, and managerial innovation (organizational innovation and strategic innovation)bring all-around benefit to enterprise.
|
author2 |
Wu,Sehwa. |
author_facet |
Wu,Sehwa. Lu,Chun-Yi. 劉俊毅 |
author |
Lu,Chun-Yi. 劉俊毅 |
spellingShingle |
Lu,Chun-Yi. 劉俊毅 不同創新類型之知識資源建置過程研究 |
author_sort |
Lu,Chun-Yi. |
title |
不同創新類型之知識資源建置過程研究 |
title_short |
不同創新類型之知識資源建置過程研究 |
title_full |
不同創新類型之知識資源建置過程研究 |
title_fullStr |
不同創新類型之知識資源建置過程研究 |
title_full_unstemmed |
不同創新類型之知識資源建置過程研究 |
title_sort |
不同創新類型之知識資源建置過程研究 |
publishDate |
2005 |
url |
http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/10783280328192642734 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT luchunyi bùtóngchuàngxīnlèixíngzhīzhīshízīyuánjiànzhìguòchéngyánjiū AT liújùnyì bùtóngchuàngxīnlèixíngzhīzhīshízīyuánjiànzhìguòchéngyánjiū |
_version_ |
1716840754208309248 |