| Summary: | 碩士 === 國立成功大學 === 政治經濟學研究所專班 === 94 === ABSTRACT
At the 80s, the public departments of different countries in the world were facing the financial crisis and continual increase of the requirements from the citizen. These have caused the thought of reconstruction in the government and the administration of the government at different countries got involved too. Further, it forms gradually a trend from government to governance, and so is our country. At the same time, Taiwan was facing the social democratic request and social energy liberation before and after the repeal of martial law that the social movement was arisen one after another to have an impact on the appropriateness of the ruler’s ruling.
Under such circumstance, the “Community Empowerment” policy was brought out and executed by the Council for Cultural Affairs in 1994 to fire the social movement of “official version”. In 2003, the central government passed the executive right of the social construction policy to the local government.
The 1994 “Community Empowerment” policy was a product of the change of the ruling attitude of the administrative department, which include the following three aspects to change the operation of the community administration through the impetus of the “Community Empowerment” policy:
1. The arrangement of the system:
Take the local government, community development association and Li Office of the past as the main roles, and then include the basic Community Empowerment Organization with informal system arrangement.
2. The policy direction:
To change the policy direction from the division level commercialized policy structure of the “up to down” mode to respectful “down to up” to combine and adjust.
3. The policy resource:
From the view of the public department, it shall turn from the public property and service offered by the public department to private organization cooperation. From the view of the community, to get extra resource through the subsidy of “Community Empowerment” plan rather than from the certain business and service charge of the public department in the past.
The gradually formed grassroots Community Empowerment Organization is mostly transformed from the community development association and Li Office under the “Community Empowerment” policy which is different from the organization target in the past that the Community Development Association served the national government with policy propaganda, delivery and distribution of welfare, while the Li Office is the businesslike route at the end point of the national government. Under the circumstance that the outside situation of the grassroots Community Empowerment Organization is for the national department to get resource such as a budget subsidy and to satisfy the “volunteerism” and democracy, etc, requirements of the community members to build up good relationship with local government is a necessary trend to bring the community policy influence into fully play.
To put its force in fully play, the grassroots Community Empowerment Organization must accumulate certain trust at the interaction and long-term cooperation with the local government. The trust from grassroots Community Empowerment Organization and local government is a dynamic process, which required long-term interaction to accumulate achievement. The two factors of trust and long-term interaction shall be built up friendly so that the grassroots Community Empowerment Organization and local government may have a good and steady social partnership. At the same time, through the trust of the local government and the coordination and authorization on activities, it also has the effect to strengthen up the status and converge force of the grassroots Community Empowerment Organization within the community.
The social partnership between the grassroots Community Empowerment Organization and the local government is built upon the observation of this study on two concrete performance aspects of the excellent decision of the public goods and the other supply source of the public goods.
|
|---|
