The studies to the cognition& behavior of graduate student by laboratory endanger- to take certain university as an example

• Main Authors: Yao-Huang Kuo, 郭曜煌
• Other Authors: Chun-Sung Chen
• Format: Others
• Language: zh-TW
• Published: 2005
• Online Access: http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/mav2ax

碩士 === 國立交通大學 === 工學院碩士在職專班產業安全與防災學程 === 94 === Abstract In the last few years, take place count up rise laboratory's accidental calamity, cause society mass ardent attention, but because laboratory nature are complex, each laboratory although do the best push safety conservancy of sanitation, but laboratory calamity still time to some extent hear of, college institutes safety sanitation education training although practicable execute, but it effect can discuss, reason proceed this research, by means of questionnaire survey stat result by this, seek to come out research born in proceed new enter personnel education training in bring forth blind spot, and take advantage of quality control technic generalize analyze seek to come out ameliorate guiding principle but give ameliorate. For evaluation laboratory safety sanitation education training effect, enhance safety sanitation job execute harvest, this research adopt questionnaire survey style, investigation graduate harm because son cognition degree are to laboratory, safety sanitation working think well of degree and to safety sanitation working cooperation wish and whether practicable wait for to laboratory, by questionnaire survey show, graduate each item cognize behaviour in at laboratory, behave best is laboratory safety sanitation job importance cognition, behave the poorest is harm characteristic cognition to laboratory, such result shows safety sanitation education training only inform student safety sanitation working importance, student can accept such information too, but but fail tell student laboratory harm characteristic why, lead to student only know should make, but do not know how to make. On the other hand then graduate base data different whether affect it safety sanitation cognition aspect, usage risk gan do more not use gan's graduate cognize degree act for high, nothing but experience time just now be like laboratory's graduate cognize degree than does not proceed experience time can study etcetera completely not enter laboratory's graduate high at laboratory too, on the other hand listen relatives and friends tell work safe accidental graduate cognize degree have better ever accepted work safe accident information's graduate high too. Direct to upmentioned two conclusions, suggestion school proceed safety sanitation education training time should by have ever accepted work safe accident information graduate tell it work safe accident experience, already can promote graduate harm cognition, can strengthen harm precaution consciousness much, should be school proceed safety sanitation job a best choose.