Developing Senior High School Students’ Awareness of Technology Strtegic Usefulness of Web-Search

碩士 === 國立高雄師範大學 === 工業科技教育學系 === 94 === The purpose of this study was to develop senior high school students’ awareness of Techonology strategic usefulness of Web-search. Nonequivalent pretest-posttest control group design was applied in the study. The researcher samples one hundren and eleven stude...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ying-Ju, Chen, 陳盈儒
Other Authors: Hung-Jen, Yang
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 2006
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/43091563485876519273
Description
Summary:碩士 === 國立高雄師範大學 === 工業科技教育學系 === 94 === The purpose of this study was to develop senior high school students’ awareness of Techonology strategic usefulness of Web-search. Nonequivalent pretest-posttest control group design was applied in the study. The researcher samples one hundren and eleven students from Fangliao Senior High School in Pingtung, with fitfty-five of them as the experiment groups, and the other fifty-six as the control groups. Experiment groups accepted the teaching of “Technology Strategic Usefulness, TSU” material. On the other hand, the researcher just taught students in control groups ordinary uses of Web-search. Before and after the experimental teaching, students took Web-search Logic Achievement Test and Technology Strategic Usefulness of Web-search Scale. The findings of this research are: 1.Material based on Technology Acceptance Model was helpful on developing students’ technolgy strategic usefulness of web-search. 2.Using the material of technology strategic usefulness of web-search can foster students’ awareness of Technology srategic usefulness of Web-search. 3.In “Single logic,” “Complex logic,” and total grade, the experiment group got significant scores than the control group. 4.In "Technology strategic usefulness of Web-search, “Perceived Ease of use,” and ”Perceived Usefulness” of Technology strategic usefulness of Web-search Scale, the experiment group was prominently better than the control group.