| Summary: | 碩士 === 國立中山大學 === 教育研究所 === 94 === The purpose of this research was to construct the indicators of
elementary school principal evaluation by the Delphi technique. The
research goals were:
(1)Discussing the domestic and foreign correlation theories and the
studies of principals''evaluation, to be the reference of establishin-
gquestionnaire of this research.
(2)Construct evaluation items that were suitable for principals''evaluat
ion in Kaohsiung.
(3)By Delphi technique, the questionnaire survey through the whole
city principals established the appropriate evaluation indicators and
dimentions.
(4)This research proposed the concrete suggestions, providing refere-
nces for the educational administration institute。
This research implemented two times of Delphi questionnaire
survey and a whole city elementary school principals'' general survey.
The first questionnaire based on the literature discussion, collecting
the entire domestic and foreign studies and evaluation indicators of
various counties that had implemented principals'' evaluation. The
content of the questionnaire divided into five dimentions, 14 evalua-
tion items and 35 evaluation indicators. After consulting with Delphi
committee members, the revision showed 6 dimentions, 15 evaluation
items and 55 evaluation indicators, developping for the second edition
questionnaire. After two times of Delphi committee mem bers'' survey,
the third revision developped 5 dimentions, 14 evaluation items and 42
evaluation indicators. Survey to elementary school incumbent princip-
als sent out 85 questionnaires, recycled 82 questionnaires, and the
returns-ratio was 96.47%.
Based on analysis of the data obtained, conclusions of the study
were as follows
1.Construct evaluation indicators that suitable for principals''evaluation
in Kaohsiung.：5dimentions (A, policy execution; B, administration
management; C, curriculum and teaching leadership; D, professional re
sponsibility; E, public relation), 14evaluation items and 40 evaluation
indicators
2.“A, policy execution”devided into 2 evaluation items and 5 evalu-
ation indicators.
3.“B, administration management”devided into 4 evaluation items
and 12 evaluation indicators.
4.“C, curriculum and the teaching leadership” devided into 3 evalu-
ation items and 10 evaluation indicators.
5.“D, professional responsibility” devided into 2 evaluation items
and 5 evaluation indicators.
6.“E, public relation”devided into 3 evaluation items and 8 evalua-
tion indicators.
7.The principals in Kaohsiung. expressed the general acceptance to
this research .
Based on the conclusions, this research proposed suggestions:
First, suggestions to educational administration institute.
1.Using evaluation indicators constructed by this research to underst-
and systematically the achievements of the principals.
2.Hold the public hearings and the explanation meetings, in order to
improve the understanding of principal evaluation.
3.Training evaluation experts to guarantee the value of principal
evaluation.
Second, suggestions to elementary school principals.
1.Principal evaluation is the current educational trend, everybody
should embrace the enthusiastic manner.
2.Based on evaluation indicators, the principals should regularly or
non-periodically comments conduct self-evaluation.
3.Paying much attention on communication and the public relation,
the principals should establish good interaction with the colleague,
the students and the community.
Third, suggestions to future studies.
1.The following research may simultaneously survey in weight of
evaluation dimentions, items and indicators.
2.May coordinate between principal and the school background to
construct the common and different evaluation indicators
|
|---|
