賣地的頭目：嘉蘭人的土地觀念變遷

• Main Author: 劉香君
• Other Authors: 陳中民
• Format: Others
• Language: zh-TW
• Published: 2006
• Online Access: http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/43546817645353956442

碩士 === 國立清華大學 === 人類學研究所 === 94 === Summary By studying the intellection of land and ceremonial behavior of Paiwan people, we herewith draw upon the land-utilization and the social relations to illustrate Paiwan culture that result in land has been reputed as the turn of symbolization of the mamazangilan`s (the master chief) status. By study the change of the intellection and circumstance of land in Ka-aluan village, we hereby understand how the environment and history can affect the Ka-aluan`s behavior. I would like to emphasize on the behavior of Ka-aluan and to figure how this behavior mode can reflect the changes of the environment and history as well as describe the perception and utilization of land in Ka-aluan village. And lastly, I would like to discuss the taboo, ceremony, utilization, classification of land in Paiwan literature, therefore to ulteriorly face all the facts in Ka-aluan village including the conflict of land, natural disaster et al. In Paiwan literature, land represents the symbol of dignitary and reputation of the mamazangilan. Nowadays those people in Ka-aluan has faced the changes of the environment and history which do inflect the alteration of the meaning of land. What are these causes due to change the intellection of land? What kind of social relation and land-utilization will give off or still maintain the concept of land in traditional culture of Paiwan? Are there any connection between the changes of environment, history and the percipience of land? Due to the research of the perception of land in Ka-aluan, we will understand people in Ka-aluan who will or will not be affect under the mainstream society? In the meantime, I would like to indicate how the possibility of persistency will culture system do create under the transformation of social circumstance? So far, what are the determinative causes of the existence of society culture? Langue, livelihood estate, environment, costume, taboo or social organization? Which one happens to be the most important trait of culture? To be brief, by using the study of the transformation and adaptive process, it will help to analyze the process and mechanism of culture sustenance.