Dynamic Analysis of Strategic Groups in Taiwanese Banking

碩士 === 國立臺灣科技大學 === 企業管理系 === 94 === The financial system of banking in Taiwan became totally different situation after “the act of financial holding company” passed. This paper applies the analysis of dynamic strategic groups to Taiwanese Banking which is owned by financial holding company. By the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cheng-Chih Chih, 職誠志
Other Authors: Pang-Tien Lieu
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 2006
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/xek3fm
Description
Summary:碩士 === 國立臺灣科技大學 === 企業管理系 === 94 === The financial system of banking in Taiwan became totally different situation after “the act of financial holding company” passed. This paper applies the analysis of dynamic strategic groups to Taiwanese Banking which is owned by financial holding company. By the way of dynamic analysis of strategic groups, we could achieve our purposes about whether banking in Taiwan exist strategic groups or not, the changes in strategic decision, the moving barrier in banking and the strategic tendency existed in banking. This paper takes 13 banks as example and makes a long term analysis for 5 years from 2000 to 2004. Besides this paper creates 8 different strategic variables based on the dimensions of scope and resource deployments which is developed by Hofer and Schendel. In the part of research method, this paper applies the method of Box’s M test, Hotelling’s T square test, cluster analysis, analysis of variance and Pearson correlation analysis to achieve our research purposes. According to the results of this research, we find there were two stable strategic time periods existing from 2000 to 2004 and 3 groups existed in each period. In the viewpoint from the structure of banking in Taiwan, this research found 1. The number of strategic groups in Taiwan was stable 2. It was difficult for banks to change their strategy from one group to another 3. It was not statistically obvious that all the strategic groups would change their strategic position at the same time. On the other sides, this research found 1. The strategic group itself didn’t change their strategy obviously 2. The strategy followed by each group contained a kind of tendency historically.