| Summary: | 博士 === 中國文化大學 === 哲學研究所 === 94 === Quian Mu’ s reflection of academic research and method can mainly be shown in the field of the study of the Confucius and Analects. Quian Mu makes a claim that Confucius and Analects are the source of the academic paradigm and personality of the cultivation of Confucian school. This paper tries to manifest the main character of Quian Mu’ Confucianism to make a right judgment to show his valuable revelation to the academic development of modern Chinese thought.
An inquiry into the research of the thought of Quian Mu ’s Confucianism is attempted in this paper. The purpose of this paper is to investigate Quian Mu ’s primordial Question and the meaning of the research method and academic paradigm based on the his Confucian philosophy especially based on New Interpretation of Analects.
This Paper divides seven chapters：1. （Foreword）：disclose the strategy of writing 2.（Reflection of Texts）：to investigate the phenomena of the forgotten of Confucianism in Modern Chinese academic thought. 3.（Methodological approach）：A transmitter and not a maker（「述而不作」）, My studies lie low, and my penetration rises high（「下學而上達」）, and “ history-culture-philosophy”（「歷史文化哲學」）4.（Fundamentality）：from the extension of the original meaning of New Interpretation of Analects to the systemic unity 5.（Differentiation）：investigate the possibility of academic context（Confucius-Chu His-Quian Mu）。6. （Evaluation）：to investigate the meaning, revelation, and potentiality of problem-puzzling of Quian Mu’s Confucianism。7.（Conclusion）：try to indicate the perennial scope of philosophy of Quian Mu’s Confucianism and the frescoing unfinished enterprises.
|
|---|
