Conversation Analysis:The Emergence And Development Of Verbal Disagreement

碩士 === 世新大學 === 口語傳播學研究所 === 94 === This study was designed to understand the emergence and development of verbal disagreement. The two questions are: 1.what is the most common conversational actions appear in conflict episodes? What are their form, content, and characters? 2. How these conversation...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ting-Chun Yeh, 葉亭均
Other Authors: Jung-Huel Yeh
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 2006
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/69883441400021060416
id ndltd-TW-094SHU05760004
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-TW-094SHU057600042016-06-24T04:14:42Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/69883441400021060416 Conversation Analysis:The Emergence And Development Of Verbal Disagreement 歧見到衝突的發展與演變—從語言行為層面探討口語衝突的歷程 Ting-Chun Yeh 葉亭均 碩士 世新大學 口語傳播學研究所 94 This study was designed to understand the emergence and development of verbal disagreement. The two questions are: 1.what is the most common conversational actions appear in conflict episodes? What are their form, content, and characters? 2. How these conversational actions link together to form sequences that lead to conflict escalation or control? The analysis focuses on lengthier interactions of two university student groups, and gathered 31 conflict episodes (approximately 186 minutes). After analyzing the group discussion by conversation analysis, the result shows that assertion, argumentativeness, complaints, confrontation, humor, disparaging, non-cooperation, and mediation are common actions we can see in group conflict interaction. To use confrontation sentences consecutively is the key to spur conflict escalation. The first reason is people always repeat the same sentences again and again that force the other side to rebut and defend. That makes conflict interaction begin from simple assertion sentences to argue, assert, and confront each other. The second reason is consecutive confrontation will let the conversation rhythm become faster because confrontation always accompany with laud and quickly speaking, rising in intonation, and interruption. If people want to avoid conflict escalation, they have try to avoid use confrontation consecutively and maintain speech characters stable, like speed of speaking, volume, the order of speaking turns, and avoidance of frequent interruption or overlap. Another way is to use humor and mediation to slow down the rhythm of conversation. Besides, to use disparaging, pause, and listening but not give positive feedback, then change the topic on the next step can prevent conflict escalation. In addition, before changing topics, paraphrasing two sides’ opinions will help the success to change topics from conflict conversation. Jung-Huel Yeh 葉蓉慧 2006 學位論文 ; thesis 148 zh-TW
collection NDLTD
language zh-TW
format Others
sources NDLTD
description 碩士 === 世新大學 === 口語傳播學研究所 === 94 === This study was designed to understand the emergence and development of verbal disagreement. The two questions are: 1.what is the most common conversational actions appear in conflict episodes? What are their form, content, and characters? 2. How these conversational actions link together to form sequences that lead to conflict escalation or control? The analysis focuses on lengthier interactions of two university student groups, and gathered 31 conflict episodes (approximately 186 minutes). After analyzing the group discussion by conversation analysis, the result shows that assertion, argumentativeness, complaints, confrontation, humor, disparaging, non-cooperation, and mediation are common actions we can see in group conflict interaction. To use confrontation sentences consecutively is the key to spur conflict escalation. The first reason is people always repeat the same sentences again and again that force the other side to rebut and defend. That makes conflict interaction begin from simple assertion sentences to argue, assert, and confront each other. The second reason is consecutive confrontation will let the conversation rhythm become faster because confrontation always accompany with laud and quickly speaking, rising in intonation, and interruption. If people want to avoid conflict escalation, they have try to avoid use confrontation consecutively and maintain speech characters stable, like speed of speaking, volume, the order of speaking turns, and avoidance of frequent interruption or overlap. Another way is to use humor and mediation to slow down the rhythm of conversation. Besides, to use disparaging, pause, and listening but not give positive feedback, then change the topic on the next step can prevent conflict escalation. In addition, before changing topics, paraphrasing two sides’ opinions will help the success to change topics from conflict conversation.
author2 Jung-Huel Yeh
author_facet Jung-Huel Yeh
Ting-Chun Yeh
葉亭均
author Ting-Chun Yeh
葉亭均
spellingShingle Ting-Chun Yeh
葉亭均
Conversation Analysis:The Emergence And Development Of Verbal Disagreement
author_sort Ting-Chun Yeh
title Conversation Analysis:The Emergence And Development Of Verbal Disagreement
title_short Conversation Analysis:The Emergence And Development Of Verbal Disagreement
title_full Conversation Analysis:The Emergence And Development Of Verbal Disagreement
title_fullStr Conversation Analysis:The Emergence And Development Of Verbal Disagreement
title_full_unstemmed Conversation Analysis:The Emergence And Development Of Verbal Disagreement
title_sort conversation analysis:the emergence and development of verbal disagreement
publishDate 2006
url http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/69883441400021060416
work_keys_str_mv AT tingchunyeh conversationanalysistheemergenceanddevelopmentofverbaldisagreement
AT yètíngjūn conversationanalysistheemergenceanddevelopmentofverbaldisagreement
AT tingchunyeh qíjiàndàochōngtūdefāzhǎnyǔyǎnbiàncóngyǔyánxíngwèicéngmiàntàntǎokǒuyǔchōngtūdelìchéng
AT yètíngjūn qíjiàndàochōngtūdefāzhǎnyǔyǎnbiàncóngyǔyánxíngwèicéngmiàntàntǎokǒuyǔchōngtūdelìchéng
_version_ 1718321295602483200